Continuity into the Present
How the oral genres feed juju, fuji, ewi and Afrobeats, how film and theatre use them, what is actually being lost, and what archives and projects exist to hear the material.
intermediatemedium·
Loading…
How the oral genres feed juju, fuji, ewi and Afrobeats, how film and theatre use them, what is actually being lost, and what archives and projects exist to hear the material.
Yoruba oral literature did not stop. It changed medium, changed audience, and changed who gets paid, and a good deal of it is now heard by more people than at any time in its history. What has weakened is not the material but the settings that used to transmit it: the evening storytelling circle, the hunters' gathering, the years a bride spent learning her chant. This file follows the genres forward.
The music history is elsewhere. yoruba-popular-music-lineage in 07-arts traces sákárà, àpàlà, wéré into fuji, wàkà, juju, highlife, Fela's Afrobeat and contemporary Afrobeats as musical history. yoruba-dance-and-theatre covers the Aláàrìnjò theatre, the twentieth-century travelling theatre and Nollywood. This file asks only what happened to the verbal art inside those forms.
The continuity is not vague influence. It is the direct use of named oral genres inside commercial recordings, and it has a scholarly literature.
Oríkì is the load-bearing element. Coker's study theorises the deployment of oríkì as a cultural resource in the music of Sunny Adé, Ebenezer Obey, Shina Peters and Kollington Ayinla, arguing that these musicians maintained the continuity of the oríkì tradition . Studies of oríkì in juju, highlife and fuji make the same case across genres . Fuji specifically incorporates Yoruba language and long-established verbal genres, proverbs and oríkì among them .
The mechanism is the same praise transaction described in file 04 and file 13. A fuji or juju bandleader names and praises the wealthy people present or the wealthy people who have paid, using oríkì material, and is rewarded. What changed is the scale: a record reaches everyone, and the praise becomes durable rather than local.
Ọfọ̀ and ìbà appear in recordings. Orimoogunje documents Àyìnlá Ọmọwúrà using ọfọ̀ in his records, and names Fatai Olowonyo, Sikiru Ayinde, Haruna Isola, Yusuf Olatunji, Dauda Epo Akara, Odolaye Aremu and Kasumu Adio among musicians deploying ìbà (homage), ìwúre (blessing), epè (curse) and oríkì in performance . He gives an ìbà text from a Fatai Olowonyo record in which the performer pays homage to elders so that younger people may in turn pay homage to him . Opening a record with ìbà is the same move as opening a chant with it.
Ìjálá crossed over. Ògúndáre Fóyánmu recorded around twenty albums of ìjálá and brought contemporary political subject matter into the chant, including his ìjálá on the 1969 tax war . Yoruba Christians and Muslims incorporate ìjálá chanting into their own worship, where it remains recognisably ìjálá because the vocal manner carries the identification . A genre founded on homage to Ògún is now heard in churches.
Ewì became a modern recorded form. This is the clearest case of a genre professionalising rather than declining. Láńrewájú Adépọ̀jù's own account of his contribution is that he modernised and professionalised ewì, and Okunoye's study presents him as a local intellectual whose work shaped contemporary Yoruba poetry, treating ewì as an open form at the interface of the oral and the written . He pioneered ewì on disc and later on cassette, using recording to produce extended poems, and the Ewi Hit Hot series circulated widely across the Yoruba-speaking area . Ọlátúbọ̀sún Ọládàpọ̀ is the other principal figure, and their early-1970s collections marked the genre's new awakening . Ewì draws freely on ìjálá, rárà, ẹsẹ Ifá, oríkì and ẹfẹ̀, which makes it a modern container for the older genres rather than a replacement for them.
Into Afrobeats. Contemporary Afrobeats artists use Yoruba proverbs and oríkì-derived self-praise heavily, and the practice has been analysed under the heading of album art and authenticity in fuji and Afrobeats . The most visible continuity is the hype performance at Nigerian parties and events, which has been studied as a direct commercial descendant of oríkì praise practice, hybridising the traditional aesthetics for economic purpose . An MC chanting a guest's lineage at a Lagos wedding is doing what an onírárà did.
A caution against over-claiming. Not every Yoruba phrase in a pop song is an oral genre operating. The defensible claim is the one the scholarship makes: specific named genres, oríkì and ọwe above all, are used deliberately and recognisably by identified artists, and the praise-for-payment economy is continuous. Claims beyond that are not supported here.
The line of descent runs from Egúngún masquerade through Aláàrìnjò to the twentieth-century travelling theatre to film, and it is documented rather than asserted. Adedeji traces the masque theatre's development from ritual through festival to theatre, with Ẹ̀sà Ògbìn taking the Egúngún troupe beyond the court to a general audience . File 03 sets this out and yoruba-dance-and-theatre carries the theatre history.
In contemporary film, the most studied case is Túndé Kèlání, whose Sàwòrò Ìdẹ̀ (1999) and Agogo Èèwọ̀ (2002) draw on Yoruba oral literature directly. The scholarship on Agogo Èèwọ̀ identifies folktale songs, children's game songs, protest songs, Ifá festive songs, tongue twisters and material from the Ifá corpus within the film, used to carry its themes of corruption and governance . Kèlání's use of Ifá narrative as cultural archetype has been studied separately . The pattern is that the film uses the genres as the tradition uses them, to comment on conduct, rather than as period decoration.
Two things follow. Film is now a significant carrier of oral genre material to a mass audience, including audiences who would never attend a festival. And film is not documentation: a Yoruba-language feature is evidence of contemporary Yoruba culture and language, not a record of traditional practice, and the two are confused often .
Precision matters here, because both the alarmist and the complacent accounts are wrong.
Weakest: the transmission settings. Àlọ́ depended on evenings without electric light, extended households, and elders with an audience. That arrangement is largely gone in urban Yorubaland. Ẹkún ìyàwó depended on years of a girl's unmarried life spent learning it, and on a marriage system that made the farewell circuit obligatory. Ìrèmọ̀jé depends on a functioning hunters' guild.
Weakest: the closed genres. The genres restricted by membership are the most exposed, because they cannot be sustained by general interest. Ìrèmọ̀jé is performed only for hunters by hunters. Ẹ̀sà requires the Egúngún society. Where the institution weakens, the genre has no other route.
Strongest: the praise economy. Oríkì-based praise is commercially viable and is therefore in no danger. It has migrated into fuji, into hype performance, into wedding MCs and social media, and the money is better than it was.
Strongest: what recording preserves. Fóyánmu recorded ìjálá; Adépọ̀jù recorded ewì. A genre with a discography survives its performers in a way an unrecorded one does not.
Genuinely at risk: the vocal manners. This follows from the argument in yoruba-oral-genre-system. If the genres are distinguished mainly by vocal expression, then what has to be transmitted is a way of using the voice, and that cannot be learned from a printed text. Ìjálá chanters have publicly complained of neglect and of difficulty transmitting the form . The vibrato and the lengthened [ooo] are the things that die first and are the hardest to recover.
Also at risk: the participatory frame. A recording cannot hear the audience answer Ààlọ̀. Converting àlọ́ into an animation, a podcast or a book preserves the story and removes the call and response, which was the genre's method of instruction, not its packaging.
The honest summary: the texts are in better shape than at any earlier point, the performance practice is under real pressure, and the occasions are mostly gone or transformed.
The corpus keeps its verified audiovisual and archive listings in sources-audio-visual, sources-archives-museums and sources-digital-projects, which are more detailed and more carefully verified than a summary here could be. The essentials for oral literature specifically:
Field recordings. Drums of the Yoruba of Nigeria, Smithsonian Folkways FE 4441, recorded at Ọ̀yọ́ in 1951 during the Ọrìṣànlá festival with notes by William Bascom, covering ìgbìn, dùndún and bàtá with material for Ṣàngó, Ọya, Egúngún, Ṣọ̀pọ̀ná, Ọrìṣànlá and Èṣù. The liner notes are free at https://folkways-media.si.edu/docs/folkways/artwork/FW04441.pdf and the LP is on the Internet Archive . Also verified: Yoruba Bata Drums: Elewe Music and Dance, FE 4294 (1980), recorded at Ila Ọ̀rangún at the Odún Egúngún festival, and Yoruba Drums from Benin, West Africa, SFW40440 (1996) .
Ethnographic film. Henry John Drewal's films are the core scholarly body, listed at https://www.henrydrewal.com/photos-films.html, including Ẹfẹ̀/Gẹ̀lẹ̀dẹ́ Ceremonies Among the Western Yoruba (filmed 1971, made 1973, 25 minutes, Ẹgbádò and Kétu) and Yoruba Ritual: A Companion Video, compiled by Margaret Thompson Drewal as the companion to her 1992 book . This is the closest thing to filmed documentation of Ẹfẹ̀ night performance.
Sound archives. The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University holds over 120,000 recordings including more than 4,000 field collections, among them the Lorenzo Dow Turner collection of 279 discs recorded in Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Togo between 1952 and 1960, containing stories, speeches and songs including Yoruba material . Most is not streamable; the catalogue tells you what exists.
A caution the corpus makes twice. Beyond the verified releases, most Yoruba performance audio online is undocumented as to performer, place, date and occasion, which makes it unusable as evidence however good the listening . And the British Library's audio access has been unreliable since the October 2023 ransomware attack, so sounds.bl.uk should not be cited as live without checking .
The most concrete current documentation effort is the Yoruba Oral Tradition Project of the Yoruba Wikimedians User Group, and its outputs are specific enough to state.
The project's stated scope is folktales, proverbs, chants and rituals, and historical narratives, documented through field visits and interviews with elders and storytellers, captured audiovisually, transcribed in Yoruba with English translations, and organised to metadata standards .
Documented outputs for 2024 and 2025 :
Two observations. The bilingual transcription standard is the right one and matches what this corpus requires. And a recording session in which the majority of contributors are women is consistent with Barber's finding about who holds this material .
Other current threads: Yoruba proverbs are being repurposed into memes, skits and digital archives, extending their reach , and the Yorùbá Name Project and Masakhane's language-technology work are building the datasets that make Yoruba speech technology possible, both documented in sources-digital-projects.
Three things follow from everything above.
Go to the recordings, not only the texts. If the genres are classified by voice, a reader who has only read them has not encountered them. The Folkways material and the Drewal films are the verified starting points.
Ask the artist's name. The corpus's persistent difficulty in this section has been that published texts name the collector and not the chanter. Any new documentation should record who performed, where, when and on what occasion, and a reader assessing a recording should ask the same .
Recover the family oríkì. Most Yoruba people alive today have an oríkì orílẹ̀ they have never heard performed, and the practical route to it is asking the oldest women in the family, which is the direct consequence of Barber's finding about who holds this knowledge . That is the one piece of this tradition a reader can retrieve without an archive.
sources-audio-visual, on Yoruba-language feature film as evidence of contemporary culture and language rather than documentation of traditional practice.sources-audio-visual, for the verified recordings and films and the access cautions: Folkways FE 4441 (1951 Ọ̀yọ́, Ọrìṣànlá festival, Bascom's notes, ìgbìn, dùndún and bàtá), FE 4294 (1980, Ila Ọ̀rangún, Odún Egúngún) and SFW40440 (1996, Benin); the Drewal films including Ẹfẹ̀/Gẹ̀lẹ̀dẹ́ Ceremonies Among the Western Yoruba (filmed 1971, made 1973, 25 minutes) and Yoruba Ritual: A Companion Video; the Archives of Traditional Music holdings and the Lorenzo Dow Turner collection of 279 discs, 1952-1960; the warning that undocumented online audio is unusable as evidence; the British Library ransomware attack of October 2023 and the resulting unreliability of its audio access; the verified negative that Hugh Tracey and ILAM hold no Yoruba drumming material.yoruba-oriki and file 13.)How Yoruba verbal art is classified into named genres by vocal manner rather than subject, who performs each and on what occasion, and why the European category "oral literature" fits the material imperfectly.
How Yoruba oral artists are trained, which genres are open to whom, how gender divides the field, how performers are paid, and the named artists the scholarship documents.
How Yoruba traditional music fed sakara, apala, waka, juju, fuji, highlife, Afrobeat and contemporary Afrobeats, traced through named musicians and specific musical mechanisms rather than gestures at influence.
Why a Yoruba dancer has to understand drum language, the aesthetic of dancing hot with a cool face, and the line from the Alarinjo masque theatre through Ogunde, Ladipo and Ogunmola to Nollywood.
Túndé King and the invention of jùjú, Ayìndé Bákàrè, I. K. Dàiró, Harúnà Iṣọ̀lá and àpàlà, Ebenezer Obey and King Sunny Adé, and the fújì line from Ṣikirú Ayìndé Barrister to K1.
The hunters' chant associated with Ògún, its vocal manner, the ìjálá artist and how he is judged, the contest setting, and what the chant does as self-portrait and as praise of animals.