Origins and Ilé-Ifẹ̀
The Odùduwà traditions and the versions that compete with them, the argument over migration versus indigenous development, and what excavation at Ilé-Ifẹ̀ has actually dated.
intermediatecontested·
Loading…
The Odùduwà traditions and the versions that compete with them, the argument over migration versus indigenous development, and what excavation at Ilé-Ifẹ̀ has actually dated.
The Yorùbá wey dem quote, the proverbs, oríkì, ẹsẹ Ifá, word list headwords, Odù names and citations dey exactly as the corpus record dem, for every language.
Ilé-Ifẹ̀ na where Yoruba tradition talk say the world and Yoruba kingship start from, and at the same time, based on archaeology, na site where radiocarbon date show say one big, dense, and technologically advanced town flourish between roughly the eleventh and fifteenth centuries CE. Dis two statement na different claims based on different evidence, and to keep dem separate na where the whole wahala of dis topic dey. The traditions no dey date demself and the excavations no dey call anybody name. Wetin follow here dey lay out the two, show where dem touch, and point out where the joining na just inference instead of real finding.
The main important thing to understand from the start na say no be only one origin tradition dey. Dem plenty, dem dey clash, and dis clash no be mistake. Dem dey carry real political fight about who first dey Ifẹ̀ and who get authority first.
The story wey people know pass talk say Odùduwà come down from sky with chain reach Ilé-Ifẹ̀, carry handful of sand, five-toed cockerel and palm nut, scatter the sand on top primordial water, release the cockerel make e scratch am spread into land, and na so dry land take form, with Ifẹ̀ as the point of creation and the name Ilé-Ifẹ̀ understood as the house of spreading or the place where land spread. For dis version, Odùduwà na god, the creation na cosmogonic, and Ifẹ̀ na literally the origin of the world.
Another well-known version talk say na Ọbàtálá, no be Odùduwà, be the being wey dem send make e do the creation. Ọbàtálá come drink palm wine shack on the way down, and Odùduwà complete the task for him place. Dis version no be ordinary small change for story. Na the charter of rival claim, and e still survive inside Ifẹ̀ ritual as the yearly conflict and reconciliation between Ọbàtálá and Odùduwà institutions.
The third version, wey behave like real history pass, no get anything to do with cosmogony at all. Inside am, Odùduwà na man wey enter Ifẹ̀ from another place, wey dem commonly call Òkè Ọ̀rà, one hill settlement for east of Ifẹ̀, and e displace or bring down one confederation of thirteen settlements wey dem know as the Elú, under the leadership of Ọbàtálá, wey already dey there . Tradition describe long exchange of war and negotiation between the two groups wey end for settlement, wey some versions talk say na smallpox epidemic cause am, where the Odùduwà lineage hold the kingship while the Ọbàtálá side retain the town ritual and spiritual seniority . Dis division still dey visible for Ifẹ̀'s ritual calendar and title structure.
The fourth version, wey dem connect well well with Samuel Johnson and with nineteenth-century Ọ̀yọ́ informants, bring Odùduwà enter Yorubaland from the east, whether na Mecca or Egypt or just "the East" like dat, as person wey dey exile or prince wey dem defeat. Robin Law show say dis eastern-origin material carry content wey dem fit trace go Islamic legend, including the story of Nimrod and Abraham, and because of dat, the best way to understand am na as 19th-century layer on top the tradition wey Islamic influence touch, no be as ancient memory . Dem still dey repeat am for popular accounts as if na the oldest version. But e very likely be the youngest.
Wetin all the traditions dey claim together, across all their versions, na Ifẹ̀'s priority: say kingship start for Ifẹ̀ and spread go outside, and say legitimate Yoruba crowns come from Odùduwà through Ifẹ̀. Law argument be say dis claim self get history, say e spread over time, and say ruling houses adopt Odùduwà descent as way to claim rank wey dem no claim before . Based on dat reading, the way the Odùduwà tradition take spread dey show the spread of political idea, no be the movement of population.
The question wey dey under the traditions na whether Yoruba people, or one ruling group among dem, come from somewhere else, or whether Yoruba society develop right inside the land.
The migration position for him old form, say one group come from Egypt, Mecca or the Nile, no get any archaeological, linguistic, or documentary support, and no current professional historian of the region dey hold am. E dey circulate because e appear for Johnson and inside early twentieth-century writing, and e appeal to colonial-era intellectual climate wey treat African achievement as something wey must get external source. Make dem identify am as artefact of dat period.
The migration position for him serious form different well well and na about much shorter distance. Historical linguistics place Proto-Yoruboid, the ancestor of Yoruba, Ìgálà and Itsẹkiri, near the Niger-Benue confluence, for northeast of the present Yoruba heartland . Akinwumi Ogundiran build on top dis to reconstruct long movement of Yoruboid-speaking populations go southwest into the forest and forest margin over the first millennium BCE and first millennium CE, where Yoruba society form in place through dat settlement instead of say e arrive as already formed . Dat one na migration argument for linguistic sense and in-place development argument for political sense, and na him be the current mainstream.
The autochthony position, as e appear inside Ifẹ̀ tradition itself, na the Ọbàtálá claim: say people already dey Ifẹ̀, organised into the thirteen Elú settlements, before the Odùduwà group arrive, and say the new people take the kingship from dem . Dis na the version wey align pass with archaeology, wey show continuous living at Ifẹ̀ before the period of political centralisation. Na also the version wey get the most to lose from the Odùduwà charter, and na reason to take him survival serious: e still stand even though na the losing side account.
Di two things no dey contradict each other. One reconstruction wey fit both di linguistic and archaeological evidence go show say people don dey live long time for Ifẹ̀ wey come start to get political centralisation for late first millennium CE, while di Odùduwà tradition dey show say na either one group from nearby arrive, wey likely be Òkè Ọ̀rà as Ifẹ̀ tradition sef talk, or na internal dynastic revolution, or di two together. Wetin person no fit defend na say na long-distance migration bring civilisation come from outside West Africa.
Archaeology for Ifẹ̀ show say settlement dey, how big e reach, di technology dem use, and di dates, without mentioning any single person name.
Chronology. Di excavations wey Frank Willett do between 1957 and 1963 bring out radiocarbon dates wey fall between eleventh to thirteenth century CE for Ita Yemòó and eighth to twelfth century for Òrun Ọba Adó . Di broad periodisation wey dem dey use now divide Ifẹ̀ and central Yorubaland into Pre-Pavement phase before roughly twelfth century, Pavement phase from roughly twelfth to sixteenth century, and Post-Pavement phase after dat one . Ogundiran put di time wey divine kingship and special kind of urbanism start for di second half of di first millennium CE, with Ilé-Ifẹ̀ for di centre of di Yoruba world between twelfth and fourteenth century as commercial centre and holy city .
Potsherd pavements. Na floors wey dem use broken pottery arrange on edge inside prepared clay bed, mostly for herringbone pattern, and na dem be di main sign to identify di classical period. Pass thirty sites for Yorubaland get dem, with Ilé-Ifẹ̀ being di one wey wide pass . Radiocarbon dating put majority of dem between twelfth and fifteenth century, wey match di period of political centralisation and urbanisation for central Yorubaland . Ogundiran note say dem dey usually follow temples and shrines, roads, and courtyard houses . For Ifẹ̀ tradition, dem talk say na Ọ̀ọ̀ni Lúwo Gbagida build dem, di only woman wey dey for Ifẹ̀ king list, and dem still dey call di pavements apáàdì Lúwo, wey mean Lúwo potsherds . Dat story na tradition, no be scientific finding with date, and person no suppose mix di two together; wetin person fit talk na say tradition link di pavements to one female ruler wey get name and archaeology date dem to di period wey tradition put her.
Work wey dem do recently find potsherd pavements far outside di Ifẹ̀ core, for northern Yorubaland, wey change di explanation from purely Ifẹ̀ thing go evidence of regional interaction across wide medieval Yoruba world .
Glass. Na dis one be di strongest single evidence and e settle di question wey argument about style no fit settle. People don tey know Igbo Olókun for Ifẹ̀ for heavy concentration of glass beads and glassworking waste, and di assumption before na say dem import di glass and just melt am again for local level. For 2006, James Lankton, Akin Ige and Thilo Rehren suggest say dem make di special high-lime, high-alumina glass for Ifẹ̀ from raw materials . Di excavations wey Abidemi Babalola do between 2010 and 2012 find pass 12,000 glass beads plus hundreds of crucible pieces wey glass cover and more production waste . Di chemical signature, roughly 10 to 20 percent alumina and 12 to 20 percent lime, no dey for European, Middle Eastern or Asian glass, wey show say dem no import am, and e match local recipe wey use high-alumina pegmatite sand wey dey available for Ifẹ̀ area mix with lime from snail shell . So, Ilé-Ifẹ̀ na confirmed primary glass production centre for early second millennium CE, one of di few wey people know anywhere for world for dat time, and di beads wey e make travel pass through West Africa.
Scale. For im classical period, earthwork walls surround Ifẹ̀ and e big well well compared to other settlements around di world for dat time. Exact population number for dat period no dey possible to get from di evidence, and any specific number wey person give for classical Ifẹ̀'s population na estimate with wide margin, no be confirmed finding.
Limits. Plenty of di most famous Ifẹ̀ finds, including di Ita Yemòó castings, na rescue conditions dem take recover dem after accidental discovery, with weak stratigraphic control . One 2021 reconstruction of Willett records note say di way di site popular differ from how small dem publish di archaeology in detail, and say dem need unpublished field records before dem fit recover di stratigraphy at all . Na why dates for individual objects often dey looser pass dates for di whole settlement.
Di political and commercial dominance of Ifẹ̀'s no last. Ogundiran place one period wey e call atrophy and regeneration from roughly 1400 to 1650, where wahala start for late fourteenth century through series of drought, hunger, and smallpox epidemics wey make plenty people migrate comot from Ilé-Ifẹ̀ and cause di collapse or change of Yoruba dynasties for fifteenth and sixteenth century . Di end of di pavement tradition around sixteenth century na di archaeological proof wey match am . Ifẹ̀ maintain im ritual importance, and continue to hold am, long after e stop to be di political or economic centre of di region. Di dispersal traditions wey talk say sons or grandsons of Odùduwà comot from Ifẹ̀ go found di other kingdoms na, based on dis reading, traditions wey link to real period of outward movement, even though di family link wey make di founders siblings na charter device.
Evidence wey get date dey support wetin dey here: say pipo dey stay Ilé-Ifẹ̀ continuously from at least di eighth century; say time dey when town life grow well well, dem make big pavement structure dem, and dem make original glass between roughly di eleventh and fifteenth centuries; say regional interaction spread reach far pass Ifẹ̀; and say disruption start from late fourteenth century go front.
Tradition dey claim, and archaeology no confirm am neither e refute am: say kingship start for Ifẹ̀ con spread go outside; say na Odùduwà start am; say dem push out or subordinate one earlier Ọbàtálá-led population; and say na Lúwo build di pavements.
Neither evidence nor tradition support: say di origin na from Egypt, Mecca or di Nile valley.
Ilé-Ifẹ̀ between roughly the eleventh and fifteenth centuries, its sculpture in copper alloy and terracotta, the industries that paid for it, and its relationships with Benin, Ọ̀wọ̀ and the Niger.
A dated timeline of Yoruba history in which every entry is marked for how well the date is actually established, since much early dating is contested.
How Ọ̀yọ́ rose to dominate the western Yoruba region and beyond, the constitutional machinery that constrained its king, the cavalry that made it work, and why both eventually failed.
The figure at the root of Yoruba dynastic claims, the several incompatible traditions about who or what Òdùduwà was, the conflict with Ọbàtálá at Ilé-Ifẹ̀, and what archaeology and historians can and cannot establish.
The kinds of evidence historians use to reconstruct the Yoruba past, what each kind can and cannot prove, and how one 1921 book shaped everything written since.
A scholarly historical account of Ilé-Ifẹ̀, examining its cosmogonic traditions, political centralisation, sacred institutions, archaeological record, and modern developments.