Becoming a Babaláwo: Training, Initiation, Ethics, and the Ìyánífá Question
The decade or more of memorisation before initiation, the stages of entry, how knowledge is checked between practitioners, and the real disagreement about women in Ifá.
The decade or more of memorisation before initiation, the stages of entry, how knowledge is checked between practitioners, and the real disagreement about women in Ifá.
The Yorùbá wey dem quote, the proverbs, oríkì, ẹsẹ Ifá, word list headwords, Odù names and citations dey exactly as the corpus record dem, for every language.
babaláwo (bàbáláwo, from bàbá, father, ní, person wey get, awo, mystery or secret; father of secrets) na trained Ifá diviner. The training dey take ten to twenty years before initiation and at least five more years after am, and the entry requirement na to memorize at least sixteen verses from each of the 256 Odù join with the offerings and interpretations wey follow each of dem. Dis na professional qualification wey get syllabus, examination, areas of specialisation, and code of conduct.
The confidence marker on top dis file na contested because of the last one-third part of am. The training pathway dey well documented and I report am with confidence. The question about whether women dey participate na wetin scholars, Nigerian practitioners, and Nigerian and diaspora communities dey truly argue about, and dis file show dat disagreement instead of to settle am.
Abimbola state the entry requirement clearly: after the trainee "has learnt at least sixteen verses from each of the two-hundred-and-fifty-six Odù together with the sacrificial items and interpretations that go with them, he can present himself for initiation"
Dat na 4,096 verses, each with the offering wey dem prescribe for am and the traditional interpretation, and dis na the minimum level instead of target. When you compare am with the estimated corpus of 150,000 verses or more, the initiate only hold small fraction, wey be the point wey dem develop for file 04 say na collectively dem take hold the corpus.
The survey figure wey Olupona give for apprenticeship na fifteen to thirty years or more . The one wey Abimbola give break down things more: pre-initiation training "takes anything between ten and twenty years depending on his age when he started the training, his own speed of learning and the eagerness of his master to impart knowledge to him," and post-initiation training dey take at least another five .
Abimbola account, as person wey dey inside both as scholar and initiate, break the process down into different phases .
To dey stay with the master. Generally, trainees dey stay with their teacher, dey help with house work and sometimes dey weed im farm. Trainees wey don mature wey get wives and children dey mostly go back their house every evening instead .
Informal apprenticeship by observation. The learner dey sit down near the master during divination and offering. E dey listen to the chanting and interpretation, hold the ìbò and other equipment as needed, and e fit join the client sing refrains . Dem dey send am messages make e gather materials for offerings and medicines, wey dey carry am go markets, farms and house of other diviners, and through dis one "the trainee Ifa priest acquaints himself with his environment and with the members of the Ifa cult in his area" Dem messages na professional network wey dem dey build so.
Formal stage one: the instruments. The first part of formal training na to learn how to use the divining chain and the palm nuts, and to learn "the names of the signature of the Odù" The trainee dey practice how to use the instruments by imself. Dis stage dey end with offering and ceremony, sisi-ọ̀pẹ̀lẹ̀-jà, wey dey show say e don master the chain .
Formal stage two: memorisation. To systematically memorize verses, wey dem dey do "beginning with the first and most important Odù to the least important" Short poems, dem dey learn everything at once, while long ones na in sections, one or two lines at a time by repeating after the master .
The self-study method get name. As the trainee dey leave the master everyday, e dey repeat wetin e learn dat day to imself as many times as possible, a process "which helps him to gain self confidence and control over his verbal art" and "is known as rírán Ifá"
Formal stage three: interpretation and offerings. Na only after e don sabi enough poems for each Odù the trainee dey move enter their interpretations and the offerings wey dey attached to dem . Abimbola emphasize say dis point dey very important: "without the traditional interpretations of each poem and their corresponding sacrifices, no Ifa priest can communicate meaningfully with his client," and the client "is more interested in the interpretation of each poem than in mere chanting"
Notice the order. Text first, meaning second. Dem dey learn the verses as sound before dem learn dem as meaning, wey be common feature of large-corpus oral transmission and wey dey protect the wording make the learner understanding no go reshape am.
Initiation. The ceremony dey gather majority of the diviners for the town and neighbouring areas, and e dey take several days of dancing, feasting and chanting . Part of am dey happen inside forest, "where the would-be priest is thoroughly examined on his competence in the Ifa system and outlook on life" E dey come out as full priest and e fit come dey practice on im own .
Na two things dem dey test there: technical competence and outlook on life. Dem dey check character, no be only knowledge.
Post-initiation specialisation. Initiation dey give only "the minimum knowledge of the system he needs in order to be able to practise" To practice well, the new priest dey specialise, and Abimbola mention the fields: "In traditional Yoruba society, Ifa priests were the physicians, midwives and psychiatrists of their own communities"
Dis stage dey require traveling. E must find "a renowned Ifa priest who has gained universal fame in the subject in which he wants to specialise," go meet am and stay with am . At least five years .
Continuing education. Abimbola make the comparison imself: "like modern academic training, the education of an Ifá priest is a life-long process," wey dey require both to strengthen wetin e don learn and exposure "to new trends in the development of his field of specialisation"
Im summary claim dey worth to quote because na di argument wey di whole description dey support: di training "dey show say societies wey no get writing fit pass down well-arranged knowledge from one generation go another without knowing di art of writing"
Two terms dey come up regularly for initiation, and wetin dey published about di exact difference between dem no plenty reach wetin practitioners dey use show.
Ìtẹfá come from tẹ Ifá, to press Ifá, di same verb wey dem dey use name di marking of di tray (tẹfá) . Na di term wey dem generally dey use for full initiation enter Ifá, where di initiate dey receive im own ikin and dem dey determine im own Odù, di Odù wey dey control im life.
Dem generally describe Ìṣẹfá as preliminary or smaller rite, wey dem often dey do for children or for people wey no dey enter priesthood, wey dem sometimes dey call hand of Ifá.
I no see any peer-reviewed source wey explain di difference, how e take dey vary from region to region, and di ritual content clear reach to fit state am here with confidence. Sources from practitioners describe am in ways wey dey clash with each other. Confidence: contested. Wetin dey documented na say initiation dey come in stages instead of one single time, and say no be every stage open to everybody, wey be di main point for di gender question wey dey below.
Ogunnaike document one stage boundary clearly: for West Africa women fit become ẹlẹ́gàn, "di people wey dem initiate without seeing Odù" Dat one show say level of initiation dey wey no reach di highest, wey dem define by wetin di initiate no receive.
Ifá no get written canon, no central authority, and no examining board past di local body of diviners. Even with dat, several mechanisms still dey check wetin practitioner fit do escape.
Di initiation examination. Diviners wey gather together dey test di candidate on competence and outlook before im fit practise . Na peer certification be dis.
Overlapping corpora. Because every initiate sabi at least sixteen verses per Odù, plenty practitioners know di common verses, and any diviner wey misquote well-known verse, anybody wey dey there fit correct am. Di check dey weak as verses dey become rare.
Di regular meetings. Abimbola mention weekly, monthly, and yearly gatherings of Ifá priests where dem dey chant poems with drum accompaniment . Performance in front of peers na where dem dey display and assess competence.
Exchange as di price of knowledge. Di proverb wey dem quote for file 04, say person dey get great poem of Ifá only in exchange for another one, describe barter economy for specialist knowledge . E dey control how knowledge dey pass around, and e mean say wetin practitioner get na evidence of wetin im give out to get am.
Di role of di client. Because na di client dey choose di verse wey relate, diviner wey recite badly or off-point dey fail clearly in front of di person wey dey pay am .
Dem suppose state di limits with di same clarity. None of these mechanisms dey verify say divination dey produce true statements. Dem dey verify say practitioner hold di corpus and dey perform di procedure correctly. Dem be quality control on transmission, no be on efficacy. And dem dey operate locally, so practitioner wey dey work outside any community of peers, wey describe plenty of di online market wey dem discuss for file 10, no dey under any of dem.
Dem document several ethical requirements inside di practice instead of to just claim dem as ideals.
Di duty to serve on demand. Di diviner dey carry im bag every time because anybody fit stop am ask for divination, and "di ever-patient Ifa priest must never refuse any request like dat and must not get di excuse say im no fit perform di divination because im instruments no dey around"
To not know di question. Di whispering procedure dey to prevent di diviner make im no bias di interpretation . Diviner wey dey try know di question beforehand dey defeat di system own control.
To no force compliance. Di client fit delay or refuse di offering completely .
Limits on taking di offering. Di diviner "fit or fit no get permission to keep part of di sacrifice for imself," and how dem take dispose am dey follow di ritual practice for di case instead of wetin im prefer .
Character as qualification. Di initiation examination dey cover person outlook on life . Di concept of ìwà pẹ̀lẹ́, gentle or good character, dey central to di ethics of Ifá and belong to di cosmology section, but im connection here na say di corpus dey treat character as professional requirement instead of private matter.
Bascom pay close attention to professional ethics and to di sanctions against malpractice for im chapter on predictions and professional ethics . I never study dat chapter close reach to fit summarise wetin dey inside am here, and I dey point to am as di place to go for details.
Dis na active dispute with participants wey dey disagree in good faith, and di honest way to present am na to show di different positions instead of to judge between dem. Di best single source na Ogunnaike peer-reviewed study, wey dey unusually careful because di author na scholar wey train under high priest but imsef no be practitioner and im clearly refuse to propose one correct answer .
Ìyánífá na di established Yorùbá term, di counterpart of di male Ifá priest .
Ìyáláwo na new word wey people form. Ogunnaike: e "go mean 'mother of secrets' and e clearly and consciously replace the male-gender term bàbá or 'father' inside babaláwo with ìyá or 'mother'." E add say: "I never hear this term for Yorubaland before, and to the best of my knowledge na neologism wey dem never use for there before" Na mostly American practitioners dey use am, and Ayele Kumari define ìyáláwo as the female equivalent of babaláwo, wey Ogunnaike see as meaningful difference for orientation: the traditional ìyánífá na counterpart, the new ìyáláwo na equivalent .
Apẹ̀tẹ̀bí dey mean women wey dem born or wey marry enter Ifá lineages wey dey support the tradition through cooking, cleaning and participation for worship . Peel find CMS records wey describe women wey dey get access to some of Ifá power through marriage enter Ifá lineage, wey Ogunnaike see say e likely dey refer to this position .
The older scholarly literature clear well-well, and Bascom state am flatly. Ogunnaike quote am: "dem dey tell women make dem care for the palm nuts of their father but dem no fit ever become babalawo," and, inside Sixteen Cowries, "na only men fit practice Ifa" Oyesakin similarly hold say women "dey relegated to the background for the practice of the cult… because dem… bar women from knowing its secrets" and say "no women Ifa priests dey among the Yoruba people"
Peel generalisation about precolonial Yorùbáland na say "clear gender distinction dey for religious practice: the oriṣa mainly engaging the attention of women, and Ifa of men," and e note say none of the Ifá diviners wey appear for the extensive CMS journals be woman . Ogunnaike observe why that silence carry weight: European missionaries "for likely take note of that kind event wey for challenge their own gender norms and expectations for the most respected priestly office"
Contemporary arguments for exclusion take different forms. Some people for Nigeria and within Santería hold am say na taboo for women to touch the ikin, ọ̀pẹ̀lẹ̀ or ọpọ́n . The gender-complementarity argument hold say male divination na for men while women get their own form, Ẹẹ́rìndínlógún, wey belong to Ọ̀ṣun and dey fully open to dem .
And one late Araba of Ẹdẹ give Ogunnaike purely practical objection: e no encourage im daughters to study Ifá because e go cause chaos during the training period, since the novices na young men and to introduce girl go create rivalry and distraction inside training regime wey no fit afford any of the two, and because conflict between men of that kind spiritual power fit dey dangerous. Ogunnaike note wetin the Araba no talk: "the Araba no state say women no capable to study and become Ifa priests, na rather say e go simply cause complications wey make am impractical"
Ogunnaike own contribution dey evidential, and e state am for im abstract: the article "demonstrates that, contrary to many popular claims, several women don become Ifa diviners for West Africa"
The historical items wey e put together:
Robin Law record say na one woman wey dem dey call Arugbá, calabash carrier, the mother of the king, bring Ifá come the Ọ̀yọ́ Empire before the seventeenth century . After that dem create the position of Ìyá Mọ̀lẹ̀ for the Aláàfin court for woman wey dey head the Ifá tradition inside the palace, though Adediran and Ogen note say e no clear whether she herself divine .
Wande Abimbola and Onifade both record the existence of ìyánífá for contemporary Yorùbáland, though dem relatively few for number .
Olajubu record one Ifá verse from Èjì Ogbè wey dey talk about the first ìyánífá, wey be Ọ̀rúnmìlà's daughter .
Abimbola argue say "Ọ̀ṣun get much more to do with the origins of Ifa divination pass wetin the babalawo dey ready to admit," as she be the original possessor of the bag of wisdom (apò ìwà) where the tradition almost certainly come from .
The origin myths demsef put women for the beginning. Ogunnaike note two: one wey one woman wey her name na Ọ̀rìṣàbí help gather the primordial palm nuts and carry dem go give Ọ̀rúnmìlà, and one wey the female òrìṣà Odù teach her husband Ọ̀rúnmìlà the secrets of divination and give am the power to do am . Baudin record the first one for 1884 and Ellis likely copy am .
Ogunnaike central analytic point na say most of the dispute no be about divination in general but about one specific ritual object.
Accounts of the òrìṣà Odù vary, "but the uniting thread amongst all of dem na say she be ritually powerful wife of Ọrunmila wey make am promise never to allow either anyone else, any women, or at least any of im other wives to see her"
The consequence: "Babalawo for Nigeria dey in agreement say if woman look Odù she go either go blind, lose the ability to born pikin, or both" And the danger no be only for women: "improper contact or even proximity to Odù amongst men fit lead to blindness and even death too"
Ogunnaike reading na say the potency na the reason for both the efficacy and the inaccessibility: "The frightening female potency of the oriṣa Odù dey behind both its efficacy and inaccessibility for most men and for all women wey also possess the power of life and death within their very nature"
Na wetin make Nigeria and Cuba get different style be dis. For West Africa, dem fit initiate women as ẹlẹ́gàn without make dem see Odù, so di highest level dey closed but di priesthood body no close . For Cuba, di way dem dey do initiation involve Odù, so Cuban babalaos reject women totally . Ogunnaike talk say: "Because Odù is not a central aspect of certain levels of initiation in Ifa in West Africa unlike in Cuba, the only real barriers to women's entry is the long time it takes to learn and practice Ifa"
If person look am like dis, di two community no dey contradict each other about di same rule. Wetin dem dey do na say dem dey apply di same rule about Odù to initiations wey get different structure.
Di matter get history wey dem document. American ọ̀rìṣà practice start through Cuban santeros for di 1970s, but many African Americans dey find form wey no get any trace of European colonialism, and many African American women dey frustrated as dem dey look for wetin Hucks describe as "alternative sources of women's empowerment, leadership, and authority" inside Yorùbá traditions
Phillip Neimark and Vassa Neimark start Ifa Foundation of North America and initiate di first female ìyánífá for United States . Wen di Cuba route close, practitioners come know say priests for Nigeria and Benin dey open to initiate anybody, so dem travel go West Africa for initiation, dey rely on African traditions as di model wey carry authority .
Di conflict hot well well. Dem accuse some women say dem dey lie wen dem claim say dem fit initiate women; one woman make one Cuban babalao shout wen e hear say dem don initiate am; Ìyánífá Oyegbade don describe di resistance and how dem push am to corner for Ọ̀yọ́túnjí Village inside South Carolina .
For 2006, one global meeting for Venezuela bring open fight, where Cuban babalaos tell one female Ifá initiate say "there is no such thing as a woman Ifa priest," while Nigerian babalawo argue say women dey acceptable . Beliso-De Jesús document di Cuban view of di American tradition as "an abject location of modern perversity" because of di feminist way e follow and how dem feel say e no respect taboos .
Two findings make am hard to just look at di matter simply as tradition versus progress.
First, Hucks record say more ìyánífá dey United States now pass Nigeria . Di reform don run pass di place wey e come from.
Di second one, wey even awkward pass, na say Ogunnaike note say di right of women to do Ifá divination "strangely has not become much of an issue in Yorubaland itself, prompting many to identify the new movement as untraditional and having more to do with modern feminism and values of gender equality than adherence to Yoruba religious and gender practices" Di argument hot pass for places wey di practice dey far from where e start.
For Ọ̀yọ́túnjí, women arrange themselves to get right to use di divination tools, and Hucks record say "one now finds women in the priesthood freely using what were designated traditional male-divination tools to assist them in their readings for clients, directly subverting certain gender configurations in other global Yoruba communities"
Ogunnaike own conclusion refuse to pick side: di aim of di article "is not to suggest a correct or orthodox stance on the position of women within the tradition of Ifa in a global perspective, but rather to examine the claims and dynamics of the various facets and players"
Wetin person fit talk with confidence:
Di claim say women never be Ifá diviners for West Africa no get support from di evidence wey Ogunnaike gather . Di claim say women initiation na modern innovation no get support too: e state say "a significant, if not abundant, amount of historical evidence of Yoruba women becoming initiated and practicing Ifa divination professionally just like men, demonstrating that female initiation is not merely a modern innovation or deviation from tradition"
Same way, di claim say Ifá don dey open to women on di same terms as men no get support. Ifá focus more on men, di older ethnography no record any female diviner, CMS journals no record any, and restrictions around di òrìṣà Odù still dey active for West Africa for women and partly for men .
How dem dey practice am dey different from lineage to lineage and na so e don always be. Some Yorùbá lineages dey initiate women, some others no dey, and di two styles dey traditional inside di only meaning wey dey, wey be say na wetin dat particular lineage don dey do.
Confidence: contested, and e suppose remain like dat. Anybody wey present either "women were always Ifá priests" or "women can never be Ifá priests" as di final answer dey flatten argument wey serious people for both sides get evidence for.
The verses filed under each Odù are case reports in verse, built to a described eight-part structure, held collectively across practitioners rather than by any one person.
What the instruments are, how a consultation runs from the client's whispered question to the prescribed offering, and which decisions belong to the diviner and which do not.
The 2005 proclamation and 2008 inscription, the state of practice in Nigeria and the diaspora, commercialisation and the online problem, and what a curious outsider should and should not do.
How the sixteen-cowrie system, kola divination, and the Fon, Ewe, Cuban and Brazilian relatives relate to Ifá, and why formal similarity is weaker evidence than it looks.
Ifá is a Yorùbá system for reaching a decision by casting a signature, retrieving the memorised verses filed under it, and reasoning from the precedents they contain.
How the corpus carries pharmacology, ethical reasoning and historical precedent, and how far the comparison between ẹsẹ Ifá and case law actually holds.