The Bakare-Yusuf Critique: Linguistic Determinism and Materiality · Ìpilẹ̀ṣẹ̀
The Bakare-Yusuf Critique: Linguistic Determinism and Materiality
A scholarly analysis of Bibi Bakare-Yusuf's critique of Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí, examining the theoretical tensions between linguistic structure, bodily materiality, and gendered power in Yorùbá history.
The debate between Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí and Bibi Bakare-Yusuf represents one of the most significant theoretical engagements in contemporary African feminist philosophy, social anthropology, and Yorùbá studies. At its core, the dispute centers on whether precolonial Yorùbá society organized power and personhood through anatomical gender or through non-biological seniority (ọjọ́ orí). While Oyěwùmí argued in 1997 that gender is a Western colonial construct alien to the Yorùbá cognitive world, Bakare-Yusuf demonstrated in 2003 and 2004 that equating the grammatical neutrality of the Yorùbá language with an absence of gendered power commits the fallacy of linguistic determinism. By restoring bodily materiality, phenomenological embodiment, and patriarchal social practices to the analysis, Bakare-Yusuf established that social hierarchies can operate through somatic differentiation even when grammar lacks morphological gender markers.
The Foundation: Oyěwùmí's The Invention of Women
In 1997, Nigerian sociologist Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí published The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses, a monograph that challenged foundational premises of Western feminist theory and African social history . Oyěwùmí argued that Western epistemologies are dominated by visualism and biological determinism, what she termed "bio-logic", in which the physical body serves as the foundational rationale for social hierarchies, labor division, and civic exclusion .
OYĚWÙMÍ'S EPISTEMOLOGICAL MODEL
Western "Bio-Logic" Yorùbá Episteme
+-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
| • Visual primacy (sight) | | • Acoustic / relational |
| • Anatomical determinism | VS | • Seniority (Ọjọ́ orí) |
| • Binary sex / gender | | • Context-dependent |
| • Woman as category | | • Non-gendered grammar |
+-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
| |
v v
Institutionalized Situational Authority
Patriarchal Subjection Based on Relative Age
According to Oyěwùmí, precolonial Ọ̀yọ́-Yorùbá society did not construct the social category of "woman" (obinrin) as an anatomically subordinate class . Instead, the primary organizing principle of Yorùbá social life was seniority (ìpò ẹgbọ́n / ọjọ́ orí), defined strictly by chronological age and relative entry into kinship groups .
Oyěwùmí marshaled three principal arguments to support this thesis:
Linguistic Neutrality: The Yorùbá language (èdè Yorùbá) possesses no anatomical gender markers in its pronominal system. The third-person singular pronoun ó ("he/she/it") and the honorific or plural third-person pronoun wọ́n ("they") operate without sex distinction . Kinship terms such as ọmọ (child/offspring), ẹgbọ́n (elder sibling), and àbúrò (younger sibling) encode relative age rather than biological sex . Titles of political leadership, including ọba (monarch) and baálé (head of household, derived from baba onílé or compound head), were categorized by Oyěwùmí as non-gendered offices accessible in principle to individuals regardless of anatomy .
Relational Kinship and Lineage Primacy: Kinship identity within the ancestral compound (agboolé) was governed by the distinction between ọmọ-ilé (lineage insider by birth) and aya-ilé (lineage outsider entering through marriage) . A female ọmọ-ilé retained seniority over any spouse entering the compound after her birth, commanding respect, domestic service, and deference from incoming wives regardless of their chronological age .
Colonial Imposition of the Gender Binary: Oyěwùmí contended that gender stratification, patriarchal exclusion from the civil service, and the political subjection of females were introduced directly into Yorùbá society by British colonial administrators and Christian missionaries . Colonial legal codes, Victorian domestic ideologies, and missionary education systematically disempowered female authority by translating fluid social positions into rigid Western gender binaries .
The Bakare-Yusuf Intervention: Materiality and Embodiment
Between 2003 and 2004, feminist theorist and philosopher Bibi Bakare-Yusuf published a decisive rejoinder titled "'Yorubas Don't Do Gender': A Critical Review of Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí's The Invention of Women" , followed by her theoretical treatise "Beyond Determinism: The Phenomenology of African Female Existence" . While affirming Oyěwùmí's imperative to decenter Eurocentric feminist universalism, Bakare-Yusuf identified fundamental methodological, linguistic, and philosophical errors in Oyěwùmí's paradigm .
BAKARE-YUSUF'S CRITIQUE MATRIX
Methodological Error: Linguistic Determinism (Whorfian fallacy)
Philosophical Error: Idealism over Materiality (loss of the body)
Kinship Reality: Patrilineal asymmetry of Ọkọ vs. Aya
Cosmological Reality: Ritual exclusions (Orò, Egúngún) and Àjẹ́ taboos
Historiographical Fallacy: Romanticization of an unblemished precolonial Eden
The Linguistic Fallacy: Grammar Is Not Social Reality
Bakare-Yusuf's primary critique centers on Oyěwùmí's reliance on what linguistics terms the strong Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, or linguistic determinism . Oyěwùmí argued that because the Yorùbá language does not lexically separate "man" and "woman" into hierarchical binary pronouns, precolonial Yorùbá speakers could not have conceptualized or practiced anatomical subordination .
Bakare-Yusuf argued that language cannot be treated as an unmediated, mirror reflection of social materiality . Grammatical structure does not exhaust the symbolic, practical, and violent ways in which power operates across human bodies . Many languages across the world: including Finnish, Turkish, Hungarian, and Swahili: feature genderless pronouns, yet the societies speaking them maintain documented structures of patriarchal inequality and gender stratification . To deduce the complete absence of a social hierarchy from the absence of morphological inflection conflates the symbolic grammar of a language with the physical practices of its speakers .
Phenomenology and Habitus: The Materiality of the Body
Drawing upon the phenomenological traditions of Maurice Merleau-Ponty , Frantz Fanon, and the sociological theory of habitus advanced by Pierre Bourdieu , Bakare-Yusuf demonstrated that power is sedimented directly onto the physical, biological body .
THE DIALECTIC OF EMBODIMENT
Discursive Layer Material / Somatic Layer
+----------------------+ +----------------------------+
| Neutral pronouns (ó) | VERSUS | Physical labor demands |
| Relational age terms | (Lived Body) | Menstrual ritual taboos |
| Non-gendered grammar | | Bodily postures (Kúnlẹ̀) |
| Kinship status labels | | Reproductive vulnerability |
+----------------------+ +----------------------------+
Bakare-Yusuf argued that human bodies are not neutral surfaces upon which discursive labels are casually applied . The female body experiences specific material realities: pregnancy, childbirth, lactation, biological menstruation, vulnerability to sexual coercion, and specialized physical labor: that shape its social location . By asserting that Yorùbá society operated purely on seniority, Oyěwùmí committed an extreme form of linguistic idealism, transforming lived social reality into a disembodied textual artifact .
Bakare-Yusuf emphasized that power in Yorùbá communities was experienced through physical, somatic enactments . Deference was not merely an abstract concept; it was a physical bodily performance, such as kneeling (ìkúnlẹ̀) for females and prostrating (ìdọ̀bálẹ̀) for males . The fact that these somatic postures differed according to sex reveals that the anatomical body was never indifferent in public and ritual life .
Kinship Asymmetries: Ọkọ and Aya in Practice
A central point of contestation in the debate concerns the kinship categories ọkọ and aya. In Oyěwùmí's formulation, ọkọ does not mean "husband" in the Western sense of an anatomically male spouse, but rather denotes any lineage insider (ọmọ-ilé), male or female, who is senior to an incoming wife (aya) .
Bakare-Yusuf exposed the structural limits of this claim by examining the actual mechanics of Yorùbá virilocality and patrilineality .
Kinship Dimension
Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí (1997)
Bibi Bakare-Yusuf (2003, 2004)
Documented Historical Evidence
Concept of Ọkọ
Non-gendered lineage insider; includes female daughters of the house (ọmọ-ilé) .
Structurally male-centered in marital practice, even if female kin deploy the title honorifically .
The ọkọ gidi (actual marital husband) exercised primary sexual and reproductive rights over the bride .
Concept of Aya
Marital outsider; subordinate purely due to late arrival in the compound, not sex .
Always anatomically female; systematically subordinated through virilocal relocation .
Wives (ìyàwó) performed the bulk of unpaid domestic, culinary, and reproductive maintenance .
Kinship Structure
Bilateral flexibility where seniority overrides anatomical sex completely .
Patrilineal and virilocal descent where male lineage continuity dictates property and inheritance .
Lineage land, ancestral chieftaincies, and family heads (baálé) were overwhelmingly passed through male lines .
Seniority (Ọjọ́ Orí)
Primary, absolute axis of power cutting across all biological differences .
Significant axis of power that operated concurrently with, rather than displacing, gender .
Seniority mediated relationships between women, but rarely placed an elder wife above the male lineage head .
The Virilocal Trap
Because Yorùbá society was overwhelmingly patrilocal and virilocal, women almost invariably left their natal compounds upon marriage to live among their husband's patrilineage . In her husband's compound (ilé ọkọ), a woman was always categorized as an aya .
While a woman might hold the honorary status of ọkọ in her own natal home (ilé ìbí), she spent the vast majority of her adult daily life in her marital home, where her status was structurally subordinate . In the marital home, aya were required to fetch water, cook, sweep, perform agricultural processing, and kneel before both male and female members of the husband's lineage . Consequently, female subordination was not an abstract colonial invention, but an everyday material condition built into the institutional mechanics of virilocal marriage .
Textual and Proverbial Analysis: The Subjection of the Wife
To illustrate how oral discourse recorded the material reality of wifely subordination, Bakare-Yusuf examined Yorùbá proverbs (òwe) and idioms that explicitly codify patriarchal privilege .
Traditional Yorùbá Proverb on Marital Hierarchy
1. Original:
Bí obìnrin bá ní aṣọ bí èèkàn,
Kò gbọdọ̀ gbójúfo ti ọkọ rẹ̀.
2. Literal gloss:
Bí (if) obìnrin (female/woman) bá (should) ní (have) aṣọ (cloth/wealth) bí (like) èèkàn (the ekan thatch grass),
Kò (not) gbọdọ̀ (must) gbójúfo (overlook / treat with contempt) ti (that of) ọkọ (husband/master) rẹ̀ (her).
3. Idiomatic English:
Even if a woman possesses clothes as numerous as blades of thatch grass,
She must never look down upon her husband.
(Translated by Bibi Bakare-Yusuf [S2]).
Notes on the translation: In Yorùbá cultural metaphor, cloth (aṣọ) represents accumulated wealth, economic status, and personal dignity. The proverb acknowledges that while a woman can attain immense independent commercial wealth, her prosperity does not exempt her from deferring to her husband (ọkọ). The verb gbójúfo literally means "to cast eyes over" or "to bypass visually", denoting contempt or insubordination. This saying directly undermines the claim that wealth and seniority wholly erased gendered hierarchy within the household .
Yorùbá Proverb on Male Primacy in Lineage Headship
1. Original:
Bí obìnrin bá gbégun,
Bí ó bá dọ́kọ,
Ọkùnrin ní ń pè é.
2. Literal gloss:
Bí (if) obìnrin (female) bá (should) gbégun (carry war / achieve military triumph),
Bí (if) ó (she) bá (should) dọ́kọ (reaches husband / marries),
Ọkùnrin (male/man) ní (is the one who) ń (continuous marker) pè (calls) é (her).
3. Idiomatic English:
Even if a woman wages war successfully,
When she enters marriage,
It is a man who commands her.
(Translated by Bibi Bakare-Yusuf [S2]).
Notes on the translation:Gbégun invokes the martial realm, historically associated with heroic exploits and chieftaincy elevation. The proverb sets up an explicit antithesis between public heroic capacity and domestic reality. Despite female capability in warfare or trade, the marital contract (dọ́kọ) subordinates the female to male authority (ọkùnrin). The use of the explicit biological categories obìnrin and ọkùnrin inside the proverb demonstrates that Yorùbá thought possessed clear categories distinguishing male from female authority .
History and Evolution
The historical trajectory of gender relations, institutional authority, and intellectual debates in Yorùbáland spans several centuries, reflecting continuous transformations in political economy, kinship, and scholarly inquiry.
CHRONOLOGICAL TRAJECTORY
14th-18th c. Classical & Imperial Ọ̀yọ́: Dual-power axes, female palace
officials (Ìyá Kérérè, Ìyá Nasó) alongside male military rulers [S1][S4][S8].
|
19th c. Yorùbá Civil Wars & Ibadan Militarism: Rise of wealthy female
war-financiers (Ìyál'óde Ẹfúnṣetán Aníwúrà) amid heightened male dominance [S6].
|
1840s-1900 Missionary Incursion (CMS): Imposition of Victorian domestic
ideology, male breadwinner norms, translation of Christian patriarchy [S1][S11].
|
1900-1960 British Colonial Rule: Codification of indirect rule, marginalization
of female chieftaincies, male monopolization of taxation and law [S1][S6].
|
1960-1996 Post-Independence Scholarship: Emergence of pioneering women's
history (Bolanle Awe, Niara Sudarkasa, Olabisi Aina) [S6][S10][S13].
|
1997 Publication of Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí's *The Invention of Women* [S1].
|
2003-2004 Bibi Bakare-Yusuf's Interventions: Critique of linguistic determinism
and restoration of bodily materiality [S2][S3].
|
2005-Present Contemporary Synthesis: Polyvocal models, religious complementarity,
and African feminist debates across continental and diasporic institutions [S4][S5][S7].
Precolonial Period: Imperial Ọ̀yọ́ (14th to 18th Century)
In the imperial political structure of Old Ọ̀yọ́ (Ọ̀yọ́-Ilé), power was distributed across dual networks involving both male lineage lineages and female palace officials . Within the royal palace (Ààfin), high-ranking women held critical institutional offices. The Ìyá Kérérè held custody of the royal treasures, supervised royal paraphernalia, and possessed the power to rebuke the Aláàfin (emperor) . The Ìyá Nasó oversaw the worship of Ṣàngó inside the palace, while the Ìyá Mọdẹ́ managed the veneration of royal ancestors .
However, as historical sociologists note, while these institutional roles gave elite women substantial leverage, they operated within an overall patrilineal dynastic structure where the monarch himself (Aláàfin) and the supreme legislative council (Ọ̀yọ́ Mèsì) were overwhelmingly male .
The Nineteenth-Century Wars and Ibadan Militarism
The nineteenth-century collapse of Old Ọ̀yọ́ led to decades of intra-Yorùbá civil wars and the emergence of new military states, most notably Ibadan . In this militarized economy, women accumulated unprecedented personal fortunes as traders, arms suppliers, and agricultural plantation managers .
The institution of the Ìyál'óde (leader of women) reached its zenith during this era . Outstanding figures like Ìyál'óde Subúọlá and Ìyál'óde Ẹfúnṣetán Aníwúrà financed military campaigns and held seats on the Ibadan state council . Yet, as historian Bolanle Awe documented, this female power was continually contested and vulnerable to male military violence: Ẹfúnṣetán Aníwúrà was ultimately assassinated in 1874 under the orders of the military ruler Aarẹ Látòósà, demonstrating the precarious boundary of female political autonomy in a male-dominated warrior state .
Missionary Contact and Colonial Rule (1840s to 1960)
The arrival of the Church Missionary Society (CMS) in the 1840s, led by figures like Henry Venn and Samuel Ajayi Crowther, introduced Victorian patriarchal norms into Yorùbá society . Missionary schools trained boys for clerical work, commerce, and public administration, while girls were instructed in domestic needlework, hygiene, and household maintenance .
With the formal establishment of British colonial rule in 1900, colonial authorities codified indirect rule exclusively through male monarchs and chiefs . Female political offices, such as the Ìyál'óde, were stripped of their statutory legislative and tax-collecting authority, relegated to informal advisory roles . Colonial land registration and tax laws treated male household heads as the sole legitimate property owners, legally dispossessing women who had historically held independent agricultural and commercial rights .
Post-Independence Historiography and the Debate (1960 to Present)
Following Nigerian independence in 1960, pioneer scholars including Bolanle Awe , Niara Sudarkasa , and Olabisi Aina established the field of African women's history, documenting precolonial political institutions and the structural disruptions caused by colonial capitalism.
In 1997, Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí published The Invention of Women, initiating an international re-evaluation of gender categories across African studies . The subsequent publication of Bibi Bakare-Yusuf's critique in 2003 and 2004 established the terms of the contemporary debate: whether decolonizing gender requires denying its precolonial existence altogether (Oyěwùmí) or analyzing how indigenous patriarchal structures interacted with, and were amplified by, colonial violence (Bakare-Yusuf) .
Cosmological and Ritual Asymmetries: Orò, Egúngún, and Àjẹ́
To refute the claim that the precolonial Yorùbá cosmos was devoid of anatomical sex distinctions, Bakare-Yusuf and religious scholar Oyeronke Olajubu examined the structural organization of Yorùbá ritual cults and religious taboos .
RITUAL STRATIFICATION AND ACCESS
MALE GUILDS / CULTS FEMALE SPIRITUAL FORCE
+---------------------------+ +-------------------------+
| • Orò: Absolute exclusion | | • Àjẹ́ / Ìyàmi: |
| of females on pain of | | Mystical cosmic power; |
| death or blindness | VS | Feared, contained, and |
| • Egúngún: Ancestral cult | | propitiated in secret |
| dominated by male | | • Gelede: Propitiation |
| initiates (Awo) | | of maternal power |
+---------------------------+ +-------------------------+
The Orò Cult and Bodily Proscription
The Orò society represents one of the most powerful executive and judicial institutions in Yorùbá political history . During Orò festivals, all females: regardless of their chronological age, lineage seniority, or wealth: are strictly confined to their houses behind closed shutters . Any female who gazes upon Orò faces execution or ritual blindness .
Bakare-Yusuf argued that if seniority were truly the sole organizing axis of Yorùbá society, elderly female lineage elders (ọmọ-ilé) would participate fully in Orò deliberations . The absolute, non-negotiable exclusion of all females based entirely on their anatomical body demonstrates that biological sex constituted an insurmountable boundary for executive sacred power .
The Ambivalence of Àjẹ́ (Maternal Power)
Yorùbá cosmology acknowledges female metaphysical authority through the concept of Ìyàmi Òṣòrọ̀ngà (the cosmic mothers) or Àjẹ́ . Female procreative power (ọmọ bibi) is held to possess immense spiritual potency (àṣẹ) capable of sustaining or destroying life .
However, as Bakare-Yusuf and Olajubu demonstrated, this power is treated within the male-dominated social structure with profound anxiety and ambivalence . When misfortune, illness, barrenness, or early death befalls a compound, suspicion is directed towards elder women as potential witches (àjẹ́) . While maternal power was revered, it was simultaneously regulated through masking rituals like Gẹ̀lẹ̀dẹ́, where male performers dance in female costume to pacify, flatter, and contain female spiritual volatility . This cosmological dynamic reveals that femaleness was symbolically marked and materially controlled .
Wider Scholarly Interventions
The debate between Oyěwùmí and Bakare-Yusuf sparked extensive dialogue among leading African philosophers, historians, and sociologists:
Oyeronke Olajubu: Complementarity Versus Hierarchy
In Women in the Yoruba Religious Sphere (2003), Oyeronke Olajubu offered a nuanced middle position between Oyěwùmí and Bakare-Yusuf . Olajubu agreed with Oyěwùmí that gender in Yorùbá cosmology was far more fluid and non-hierarchical than in Western frameworks, noting that deities (òrìṣà) often transcend rigid binary classifications .
However, Olajubu broke with Oyěwùmí by maintaining that gender differentiation did exist in precolonial religious life, operating on a model of complementarity rather than subordination . In Olajubu's formulation, male and female ritual roles were distinct yet mutually dependent, although she acknowledged that historical pressures frequently allowed male hierarchies to restrict female access to supreme executive shrines .
Nkiru Nzegwu: The Dual-Sex Political Model
Philosopher Nkiru Nzegwu supported Oyěwùmí's foundational challenge to Western feminist universalism in Family Matters: Feminist Concepts in African Philosophy of Culture (2006) . Drawing from Igbo and Yorùbá institutions, Nzegwu argued that Western feminists misread African societies by assuming that the male was always normative and that power was unitary .
Nzegwu demonstrated that precolonial societies utilized dual-sex political structures where women governed female affairs, market systems, and specialized courts completely independently of male control . While accepting Bakare-Yusuf's point that bodily differences carried social meaning, Nzegwu insisted that these differences did not translate into inherent male dominance before colonial legal intervention .
Andrea Cornwall: Lived Negotiations and Market Autonomy
Anthropologist Andrea Cornwall conducted long-term ethnographic fieldwork in Ado-Odo, an ancient Yorùbá town in Ogun State . Cornwall showed that while Yorùbá women maintain high economic autonomy through market commerce, trade networks, and personal wealth accumulation, they operate within pervasive patriarchal expectations regarding marriage, childbearing, and elder respect . Cornwall argued that neither absolute non-gendered egalitarianism (Oyěwùmí) nor static patriarchal domination (Western feminist models) adequately describes the complex, situational bargaining that Yorùbá women perform daily .
Methodological Summary: What the Debate Achieved
The scholarly confrontation between Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí and Bibi Bakare-Yusuf generated enduring conceptual advancements for African philosophy, feminist methodology, and Yorùbá historiography:
Dismantling False Universalism: It permanently discredited the assumption that Western feminist categories of "gender", "patriarchy", and "the nuclear family" can be applied uncritically to non-Western societies without rigorous historical and linguistic examination .
Defeating Linguistic Determinism: It proved that language alone cannot serve as an uncritical proxy for social practice, establishing that bodily materiality, labor relations, and physical vulnerability must be analyzed alongside grammatical structures .
Rejecting Precolonial Edenism: It demonstrated the theoretical dangers of romanticizing precolonial African societies as harmonious, egalitarian utopias, showing that defending African cultural dignity does not require denying historical forms of indigenous hierarchy, domestic asymmetry, and violence .
Establishing Contextual Multi-Axis Analysis: It firmly established that Yorùbá social organization cannot be reduced to a single master principle: whether gender or seniority. Instead, social power operates as a dynamic matrix where chronological age (ọjọ́ orí), lineage status (ọmọ-ilé versus aya-ilé), anatomical sex (obìnrin versus ọkùnrin), economic wealth (orò), and spiritual potency (àṣẹ) intersect continuously .
Where e come from
[1]Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí, The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997).
[2]Bibi Bakare-Yusuf, "'Yorubas Don't Do Gender': A Critical Review of Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí's The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses," African Identities 1, no. 1 (2003): 119-140. Reprinted in African Gender Scholarship: Concepts, Methodologies and Paradigms, edited by Signe Arnfred et al. (Dakar: CODESRIA, 2004), pp. 61-81.
[3]Bibi Bakare-Yusuf, "Beyond Determinism: The Phenomenology of African Female Existence," Feminist Africa 2 (2003): 8-24.
[4]Oyeronke Olajubu, Women in the Yoruba Religious Sphere (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003).
[5]Nkiru Uwechia Nzegwu, Family Matters: Feminist Concepts in African Philosophy of Culture (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006). See also Family Bonds/Conceptual Binds: African Notes on Feminist Epistemologies, Signs 25, no. 4 (2000): 1083-1087.
[6]Bolanle Awe, ed., Nigerian Women in Historical Perspective (Ibadan: Sankore Publishers / Bookcraft, 1992).
[7]Andrea Cornwall, "Wayward Wives, Misfit Mothers: Contesting Gender and Setting Rules for Retirement in Ado-Odo, Southwest Nigeria," in Readings in Gender in Africa, edited by Andrea Cornwall (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005), pp. 168-175. See also Andrea Cornwall, "Spending Power: Love, Money and the Reconfiguration of Gender Relations in Ado-Odo, SW Nigeria," American Ethnologist 29, no. 4 (2002): 963-980.
[8]J. A. Fadipe, The Sociology of the Yoruba (Ibadan: Ibadan University Press, 1970).
[9]Karin Barber, I Could Speak Until Tomorrow: Oriki, Women and the Past in a Yoruba Town (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1991).
[10]Niara Sudarkasa, Where Women Work: A Study of Yoruba Women in the Marketplace and in the Home (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1973).
[11]Cheryl Johnson-Odim and Nina Emma Mba, For Women and the Nation: Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti of Nigeria (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1997).
[12]Kwasi Wiredu, Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996).
[13]Olabisi I. Aina, "African Women at the Crossroads: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in African Women's Studies," African Studies Review 41, no. 3 (1998): 65-87.
[14]Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, translated by Richard Nice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).
[15]Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962).