Ṣàngó, Ajaka and the Early Aláàfin: King or Òrìṣà · Ìpilẹ̀ṣẹ̀
Ṣàngó, Ajaka and the Early Aláàfin: King or Òrìṣà
Ṣàngó is worshipped as the òrìṣà of thunder and named in Ọ̀yọ́ king lists as the fourth Aláàfin, and this file sets out what each tradition says, why the two cannot simply be merged, and what scholars have argued.
intermediatecontested24 min de lecture·4 sources
Decorative pattern for Ṣàngó, Ajaka and the Early Aláàfin: King or Òrìṣà
Ṣàngó is one of the most widely worshipped òrìṣà in the world, honoured in Nigeria, Benin, Cuba, Brazil and Trinidad, and he is also listed in the Ọ̀yọ́ dynastic tradition as the fourth Aláàfin, a son of Ọ̀rànmíyàn who reigned violently, was deserted, hanged himself at a place called Kòso, and was afterwards deified. The relationship between those two facts is the substantive question and it has not been settled. This file separates the narrative Ọ̀yọ́ tradition tells, the position of Ṣàngó worship itself, and what historians have argued, and it does not pretend to adjudicate between them.
His brother Ajaka, who reigned before him, was deposed for him, and returned to the throne after his death, is the other half of the story and is usually left out of popular accounts, which weakens them considerably.
What the Ọ̀yọ́ dynastic tradition says
The fullest published version is Samuel Johnson's, recorded in the late nineteenth century from Ọ̀yọ́ palace tradition and published in 1921 . Johnson gives Ọ̀rànmíyàn two sons who reigned in turn, Ajaka and Ṣàngó, and treats both as deified after death.
Ajaka, also called Ajuan, first held the throne as regent when his father left for Ilé-Ifẹ̀ and was subsequently confirmed as king. Johnson describes him as unlike his father: peaceful, devoted to husbandry, and encouraging of it. He was deposed for being too mild for a warlike age and for tolerating the encroachments of provincial kings, in particular the Olówu, who had compelled him to pay tribute. He withdrew to Igbodo for seven years while his brother reigned. He is the only Aláàfin in the list to hold the throne twice .
Ṣàngó, also called Olúfìran, is described as wild in disposition, fiery in temper, and skilled in sleight of hand, with a habit of emitting fire and smoke from his mouth that increased his subjects' fear of him. He refused the Olówu's tribute demand, won the war that followed, and grew tyrannical with success. Johnson attributes to him the removal of the seat of government to Ọ̀yọ́ by a stratagem: having had a Hausa slave marked with 122 razor cuts as punishment for negligence, and having found that the resulting scars were admired, he made facial and arm marking a badge of royalty, then persuaded the ruler of Ọ̀yọ́-kòró and his chiefs to submit to the same marking and attacked on the third day while they were too sore to resist . Johnson records that Ṣàngó himself endured only two cuts on each arm, and that the marks known as kẹ́yọ, two broad ribbon marks on the arms, were retained in the royal family as a badge, members of which are termed Akẹ́yọ .
The end, in Johnson's telling, comes from Ṣàngó's own charm-making. Experimenting with a preparation to attract lightning, he tested it on his own house from a hill; the palace was struck and burned, and many of his wives and children died. Broken by it, and resisted when he tried to abdicate, he killed 160 people in a fit of anger, then set out with a few followers for his mother's Nupe kin. His head slave and favourite Bíri turned back, Òmìrán followed, and Ṣàngó, alone and unable to return for shame, hanged himself from a shea butter tree. His friends buried him under it. Bíri killed himself at Kòso where the king died, Òmìrán likewise, his cousin Ọmọ Sìndà at Papo, Babayanmi at Sele, Obei at Jakuta, and Ọya his favourite wife at Ira .
Johnson then records the practice that follows: at every flash of lightning and peal of thunder in Yoruba and Popo towns the people call out. He gives the words as "Ka wo o, ka biye si."
Original (as Johnson prints it, in his pre-standard orthography):
Ká wọ ò, ká bíyè sí
Literal gloss. Ká wò ó, "let us behold him"; ká bí ọ̀yẹ̀ sí, "let his reign be added to." The formula is a royal acclamation and it is not addressed to a god of weather in the abstract; it is addressed to a king.
Idiomatic English, Johnson's own rendering: "welcome to your majesty, long live the King"
Notes on the translation. Johnson's gloss is loose in a revealing way. The acclamation is the standard Yoruba greeting to a reigning ọba, and its use at thunder is precisely the point: the thunder is greeted as the king. This is also where the phrase Ọba kò so, "the king did not hang," attaches, which is the standard explanation for the place name Kòso and for the Ṣàngó title Ọba Kòso. The devotional tradition uses that phrase to deny the suicide, and Johnson, who reports the suicide, is recording the dynastic account rather than the devotional one. Both are Yoruba traditions and they are in direct conflict on the central fact.
Ajaka returned and reigned again, and Johnson says he came back transformed, more warlike than his brother had been, campaigning successfully into Nupe country and afterwards fighting civil wars against a very large number of his own chiefs and provincial kings including the Oníkòyí, the Olúgbọ̀n and the Arẹ̀sà . Johnson is explicit about his own method at one point in this material, writing of the Nupe expedition that "what is certain is, that the expedition was successful but by what means, it is not really known," and adding that brave deeds tend to be attributed to the supernatural . That is a nineteenth-century Yoruba historian marking his own evidence, and it is worth noticing.
What the devotional tradition says
Ṣàngó worship does not present itself as the cult of a dead king whose suicide was covered up. Ọba Kòso, "the king did not hang," is a positive theological statement within the tradition: the king did not die that way, he descended into the earth and became òrìṣà. The òrìṣà is associated with thunder, lightning, fire, the double axe, the ram, and with justice as force, and possession by Ṣàngó is a central practice of the cult. The stone celts turned up by ploughing, ẹdùn àrá, are held to be his thunderstones and are kept in his shrines. The òrìṣà material is treated fully in the òrìṣà section of this corpus.
The relevant point here is that the cult's own account does not require, and in its central formula denies, the biography the dynastic list supplies. A reader who resolves the tension by saying "he was really a king who got made into a god" is adopting the historians' framing over the practitioners', and should know they are doing so.
What scholars have argued
Three positions are in the literature and none commands consensus.
The historical king deified. The oldest scholarly reading, and the one that follows Johnson most directly, takes Ṣàngó as the fourth Aláàfin whose dramatic death and violent reputation produced a cult. C. L. Adeoye and others in the Yoruba-language scholarly tradition have worked with an identification of the historical figure within the Ọ̀yọ́ list . The difficulty is that it requires the cult's central denial to be a cover story.
A pre-existing òrìṣà whose name the king took. Akíntúndé Akínyẹmí has argued against the deification reading on internal grounds: all Aláàfin of Ọ̀yọ́ are deified after death, and a great many died by suicide, so neither the deification nor the suicide distinguishes Ṣàngó or explains why he alone became a major òrìṣà. The alternative he sets out is that a mythical Ṣàngó preceded the historical Aláàfin, that the king was a devotee who took the name and attributes, and that the two were subsequently conflated . This has the merit of explaining why the cult's own account contradicts the dynastic one, and it fits the fact that Ṣàngó worship is much older and more widespread than Ọ̀yọ́ political reach at the relevant period would suggest.
The cult as an instrument of Ọ̀yọ́ statecraft. A third line, which is compatible with either of the above, examines Ṣàngó worship as a political institution. Ọ̀yọ́ used the Ṣàngó priesthood administratively, and the cult travelled with Ọ̀yọ́ power, which gives a state interest in binding the òrìṣà to the dynasty regardless of which came first. The essays collected in Joel E. Tishken, Toyin Falola and Akíntúndé Akínyẹmí, eds., Sàngó in Africa and the African Diaspora, are the standard place to see these arguments set against each other .
There is also a Nupe dimension that the traditions themselves supply. Ṣàngó's mother is Torosi, daughter of the Nupe king Elempe, in both Johnson and the wider tradition , and Ṣàngó iconography and the cult's relation to Nupe territory have been read as recording a real cultural transmission rather than a genealogical decoration.
The honest position
There was almost certainly an Aláàfin remembered under this name in the Ọ̀yọ́ list. There is certainly an òrìṣà of thunder worshipped across a far wider area than Ọ̀yọ́ ever governed, and across the Atlantic. Whether the second derives from the first, the first from the second, or both from a shared earlier source, is not established by any evidence currently available, and confident statements in either direction, including the very common "Ṣàngó was a real king who was later made a god," go beyond what can be shown.
Sources
[1]Samuel Johnson, The History of the Yorubas: From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the British Protectorate, ed. Obadiah Johnson (London: George Routledge and Sons, 1921), "The Founders of the Yoruba Nation," §3 Ajuan alias Ajaka, §4 Sango or Olufiran, §5 Ajaka's Second Reign, pp. 148-153. Full text at https://archive.org/details/historyofyorubas00john . All narrative detail attributed to Johnson in this file is quoted or closely paraphrased from those pages, including the deposition of Ajaka and the Olówu tribute, the smoke and fire, the 122 razor cuts and the origin of the kẹ́yọ marks and the term Akẹ́yọ, the Ọ̀yọ́-kòró stratagem, the lightning charm and the burning of the palace, the killing of 160 people, the desertion by Bíri and Òmìrán, the hanging at Kòso, the suicides of Bíri, Òmìrán, Ọmọ Sìndà, Babayanmi, Obei and Ọya at their named places, the thunder acclamation and Johnson's own English gloss of it, and Ajaka's second reign and Nupe expedition. Johnson is a primary source for Ọ̀yọ́ palace tradition as held in the 1890s, mediated by a Christian pastor writing for a mission audience; his handling of Yoruba religion is unsympathetic and that shapes his telling.
[2]On the identification of the historical fourth Aláàfin within the Yoruba-language scholarly tradition, including C. L. Adeoye's treatment: discussed in the review and secondary literature on Ṣàngó studies, including the review of Sàngó in Africa and the African Diaspora at https://muse.jhu.edu/article/433666 . The corpus has not been able to verify Adeoye's exact formulation against the original Yoruba text, and confidence on that specific attribution is medium.
[3]Joel E. Tishken, Toyin Falola and Akíntúndé Akínyẹmí, eds., Sàngó in Africa and the African Diaspora (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009). Source for Akínyẹmí's argument that the deification reading is weak because all Aláàfin are deified and many died by suicide, and for the alternative that a mythical Ṣàngó preceded the historical Aláàfin who adopted his name and attributes. Review at https://muse.jhu.edu/article/433666
[4]On Ọba Kòso as a theological formula within Ṣàngó worship rather than a historical claim, and on the cult's practice, iconography and diaspora spread: see the òrìṣà section of this corpus and its sources, principally William Bascom, Shango in the New World (Austin: African and Afro-American Research Institute, University of Texas, 1972) and J. Omosade Awolalu, Yoruba Beliefs and Sacrificial Rites (London: Longman, 1979).