Adìrẹ Oníko and Alábẹ̀rẹ́
Technical processes, material substrates, gender dynamics, and museum histories of Yoruba raffia-tied and needle-stitched indigo resist textiles.
Adìrẹ oníko and adìrẹ alábẹ̀rẹ́ na di two main mechanical resist-dyeing tradition wey Yorùbá textile artist dem develop to take produce fine-fine white-and-indigo pattern for cotton cloth. Adìrẹ oníko dey rely on tying section dem of fabric tight-tight with raffia palm fiber round small solid object or into pleat wey dem gather together, while adìrẹ alábẹ̀rẹ́ dey use hand needle or sewing machine stitch linear and geometric pattern dem wey dem dey draw tight before dem soak am inside di indigo vat. As e happen for history inside special compound wey women dey work and trade guild for city dem like Abẹ́òkúta, Ìbàdàn, and Òṣogbo, dis resist technique dem go through serious change for how dem look and for economic matter around late nineteenth and early twentieth century after European factory cotton cloth and synthetic dye enter.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Yorùbá Resist Textiles │
│ (Adìrẹ) │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┐
│ │
[Mechanical Resist] [Paste Resist]
│ │
┌────────┴────────┐ │
│ │ │
Adìrẹ Oníko Adìrẹ Alábẹ̀rẹ́ Adìrẹ Ẹlẹ́kọ
(Tied Resist: (Stitched Resist: (Cassava Starch:
Raffia / Ìko) Needles / Abẹ́rẹ́) Hand / Stencil)
Terminology and Etymology
Di general name adìrẹ na compound noun wey come from di Yorùbá verb dem di (to tie, bind, or pack together) and rẹ (to soak, dip, or dye) . Di direct meaning na "wetin dem tie and dye." Inside Yorùbá cloth classification, di term dey distinguish resist-pattern fabric from plain indigo cloth (aró) and narrow-strip loom cloth (aṣọ-òkè) .
Di subcategory oníko come morphologically from di prefix oní- (person wey get, hold, or dey use) and di noun ìko (di fiber wey dem prepare from raffia palm, Raphia vinifera) . Adìrẹ oníko translate literally as "tied-resist cloth wey dem use raffia make."
Di designation alábẹ̀rẹ́ follow di exact same morphological construction, as e combine oní- (wey phonologically assimilate enter al- before open vowel) and abẹ́rẹ́ (needle) . Di term translate literally as "cloth wey dem use needle produce" or "needle-stitched resist." Where oníko dey emphasize di material wey dem use tie, alábẹ̀rẹ́ dey emphasize di tool wey dem use pierce di cloth to pass di resist thread through di fabric .
Technical Processes and Materiality
Di production of both oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ involve series of step wey depend on each other: to prepare material, construct pattern, ferment dye vat, soak inside dye many times, and lose di thread or tie with hand.
[Plain White Cotton Substrate]
(Indigenous Kíjìpá or Imported Calico)
│
▼
[Pattern Application / Resist Phase]
├── Adìrẹ Oníko: Fabric folded/pleated; tied with raffia (ìko) around seeds/stones
└── Adìrẹ Alábẹ̀rẹ́: Hand/machine stitched with raffia or thread; gathered tight
│
▼
[Indigo Vat Immersion (Aláró Guild)]
Fermented Lonchocarpus cyanescens / Indigofera + Potash/Wood Ash Alkaline Solution
Multiple dips and oxidations (10 to 20+ cycles) to achieve deep blue-black
│
▼
[Drying and Rinsing]
Oxidation fixes indigo; excess dye washed from bound cloth
│
▼
[Resist Extraction / Unpicking]
Raffia cut, threads pulled, knots loosened
Unexposed areas emerge as crisp white/light-blue patterns on dark indigo ground
Fabric Substrates and di Shift to Imported Cotton
Before di late nineteenth century, Yorùbá resist dyer dem work mostly on top kíjìpá, one thick, heavy, handspun, and hand-woven plain-weave cotton wey dem produce for domestic broad upright loom or narrow horizontal loom . Even though kíjìpá strong well-well, di rough weave, yarn wey no balance for size, and heavy weight make am hard to make precise stitched resist and make tight raffia binding require plenty labor .
From di 1890s, British colonial commercial network introduce plenty cheap, lightweight, factory-woven plain cotton cloth, wey dem know for trade as calico, shirting, or baft . Dis imported cotton transform resist dyeing. Di smooth surface, uniform thread density, and soft body allow female designer dem (aládìrẹ́) to fold di fabric into small-small micro-pleat, sew fine chevron stitch without much resistance, and tie raffia tight well-well .
Binding and Resist Media: Raffia and Metal Needles
Di main resist material inside oníko cloth na ìko, di dry stripped skin from young leaf of Raphia vinifera palm . Raffia dey retain strong tensile strength even when e wet, e no dey stretch under tension, and e dey block dye from entering because of di natural wax surface wey e get . When dem tie am with enough force, di raffia dey prevent di indigo liquid from reaching di cotton fiber underneath.
Inside alábẹ̀rẹ́, di primary tool historically na fine metal sewing needle (abẹ́rẹ́) wey dem dey use pass raffia or cotton bast thread through di cotton cloth . Metal needle allow different kind of continuous running stitch, cross-stitch, basting line, and gathered fold wey person no fit do with just hand-bunching alone .
Adìrẹ Oníko: Mechanics of Tied Resist
Adìrẹ oníko get several distinct method of physical manipulation:
- Object-Centered Binding: Di person wey dey design dey put small, hard, roundish things under di cloth. Material wey record show say dem dey use include dry corn, small stone, small cowrie, or seed . Dem go gather di cloth round di thing from under, and use raffia tie am round and tight for di bottom of di node wey dem gather. After dem dye am finish and open am, e dey bring out concentric ring, sunburst pattern, or dot dot dem, wey local language often dey call alákẹtẹ̀ (wey resemble small cap or circle shape) .
- Pleating and Folding: Dem dey fold di cloth like accordion pleat, roll am diagonally, or squeeze am, and den tie am at regular intervals with wide band of raffia. Di part inside di tight fold wey dye no touch dey remain white, and e dey create geometric grid, diagonal chevron, or bold horizontal stripe across di full length of di wrapper .
- Marbling and Knotting: Dem dey pack di cloth together anyhow and use long raffia tie am irregularly, so e dey give design wey no get standard shape, wey be like web or mottled indigo surface .
Cross-section of an Adìrẹ Oníko Binding Node:[Raffia Wrappings / Ìko] (Impermeable to dye) │ │ │ │ │ │ ┌─────┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─────┐ │ /═══════════════\ │ <-- Exterior cotton gathers │ │ (SEED / │ │ │ │ PEBBLE) │ │ <-- Core object │ \═══════════════/ │ └──────────┬──────────┘ │
[Exposed Cloth] │ [Exposed Cloth] (Dyes Deep Blue) └── (Dyes Deep Blue)
Adìrẹ Alábẹ̀rẹ́: How Stitched Resist Dey Work
Adìrẹ alábẹ̀rẹ́ dey totally depend on di tension of thread wey dem pass through di cloth:
- Running-Stitch Gathering: Di artisan dey sew long parallel row of running stitch across part of di cloth. Once dem finish one row or section, dem go drag di thread with strong force, making di cloth fold together into tight accordion or ridge. Dem go knot di thread well well for di end. Di tight fold inside di cloth no dey let dye enter, while di top of di ridge wey open dey absorb am, and this one dey bring out fine, delicate white line pattern across di indigo background .
- Quilted and Appliquéd Folding: Dem dey fold cloth put on top itself and sew am along di edge to create raised design before e go enter inside di dye vat .
- Cut-and-Pick Removal: After dem don finish di dyeing cycle and di cloth don dry completely, di artisan dey use small blade or needle take cut di knotted thread end and carefully comot every stitch from di cotton base. If dem drag di thread anyhow, di fragile dyed cotton fiber fit tear .
Mechanics of an Adìrẹ Alábẹ̀rẹ́ Stitched Ridge:
Thread pulled tight (knotted at terminus) │ ▼ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ <-- Ridge crests (Exposed to Indigo: Blue) / \ / \ / \ / \ /
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ <-- Inner fold valleys (Compressed: Pure White) └───┴───┴───┴───┴───┘
Di Indigo Chemistry: Vat, Fermentation, and Dyeing
Di dyeing of adìrẹ different chemically from ordinary topical staining. Indigo na insoluble organic compound (indigotin) wey need chemical reduction make e turn to soluble, yellowish-green form (leuco-indigo) inside alkaline medium before e fit bond with cellulose fiber .
For traditional Yorùbá dyeing center, di master dyer (aláró) dey use local indigo plant, especially Lonchocarpus cyanescens (wey dem dey call locally as ẹlú) or different type of Indigofera . Dem dey crush di fresh leaf wey dem harvest into ball, dry dem for sun, and put dem inside deep pit wey dem dig for ground or big earthenware pot .
To get di alkaline solution wey dey necessary, dem dey mix wood ash or di burnt residue of cocoa pod and farm waste (káà) with water, and filter am through straw sieve enter inside di vat . Di vat dey undergo microbial fermentation for several days. Di aláró dey check how di vat dey through smell, taste, di film wey form on top am, and temperature without thermometer or chemical titration .
Dem dey dip di wrapper wey dem tie or sew inside di vat. Because leuco-indigo dey only oxidize turn into insoluble blue indigotin when e touch atmospheric oxygen, dem must continuously dip di cloth, bring am out into di air make e oxidize, and dip am again . To get di deep, shining blue-black color wey Yorùbá aesthetic judgment (dúdú) like, e dey take anywhere from ten to twenty-five consecutive dipping and airing cycle over several days .
Organization of Labor, Gender, and Technological Shift
Di production of adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ represent advanced economic system wey dem divide by gender and wey family compound plus occupational guild dey control, as documented particularly in Abẹ́òkúta and Ìbàdàn .
┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Female Domestic Textile Guilds │
└─────────────────┬──────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┐
│ │
▼ ▼
┌───────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐
│ The Aládìrẹ́ │ │ The Aláró │
│ (Pattern Decorators) │ │ (Master Dyers) │
├───────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────┤
│ • Ties raffia (oníko) │ │ • Maintains vats │
│ • Sews stitches │ │ • Formulates alkali │
│ (alábẹ̀rẹ́) │ │ • Conducts dipping │
│ • Autonomous pricing │ │ • Controls chemistry │
└───────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘
│ │
└──────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌───────────────────────────────┐
│ Colonial Structural Shift │
│ (1920s–1930s) │
├───────────────────────────────┤
│ • Treadle sewing machines │
│ • Introduction of male labor │
│ • Commercial acceleration │
└───────────────────────────────┘
Guild Division-dem: Aládìrẹ́ and Aláró
Historically, di way dem dey produce Yorùbá resist textile stand on strong division of labour between two different role-dem for women:
- Di Aládìrẹ́ (Design Decorator-dem): Dis women and young apprentice-dem specialize only on how to put di resist material for di white cloth . Dem get dia own needle, buy dia raffia bundle from rural trade network-dem, and cut di complex geometric pattern-dem put for di cloth. Dem dey charge di cloth owner or middle trader per piece for dia tying and stitching work .
- Di Aláró (Master Dyer-dem): Di aláró get exclusive access to di dye vat-dem, wey dey inside special open-air dye complex-dem (ẹbù aró) wey compound matron women dey control . Di aláró dey charge money to dip and soak di tied cloth wey di aládìrẹ́ prepare. Dem maintain strong guild rule-dem about dye quality, price, and apprentice training .
Judith Byfield document say dis two-guild structure give Yorùbá women serious economic independence and political power inside di colonial urban economy of Abẹ́òkúta during di early twentieth century .
How Sewing Machine and Men Artisan Enter di Work
During di 1920s and 1930s, major technology change happen inside di production of adìrẹ alábẹ̀rẹ́: na wen dem start to use treadle sewing machine . To use hand and needle sew complete two-panel wrapper fit take aládìrẹ́ reach two weeks of continuous hand work . Machine operator wey dey use heavy cotton thread fit sew di parallel line-dem and gathered fold-dem within small fraction of dat time, wey make di commercial production increase well-well .
Dis new technology change di gender arrangement of di craft. For Yorùbá society, machine, metal tool, and commercial equipment na work wey culture and history see as men work . Because of dis one, young men enter di adìrẹ industry specifically as machine-stitcher for alábẹ̀rẹ́, dey work either as wage worker for female compound head-dem or as independent contractor-dem . But hand-tying (oníko) and chemical vat-dyeing (aláró) still remain strictly women work .
Artist-dem Wey Get Name and Historical Erasure
Di history writing of adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ get structural tension between di deep institutional anonymity inside historical record and how globally recognized master artist-dem wey get name come rise for post-colonial era.
Structural Anonymity for Inside Historical Archive
Di historical record of di nineteenth and early twentieth century almost keep quiet completely about di individual name of di women wey design and make historical oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ wrapper-dem . Unlike adìrẹ elẹ́kọ (cassava-starch paste resist), where decorator-dem sometimes dey paint maker mark, town name, or compound initial put for di corner grid of di pattern, tied and stitched cloth-dem no get any structural way to add letter or number signature .
Dem dey produce cloth together inside domestic compound-dem, bring dem go central urban market-dem like Itoku for Abẹ́òkúta or Oja'ba for Ìbàdàn, and sell dem as commercial market goods . European merchant-dem, colonial officer-dem, and ethnographer-dem collect dis textile-dem as nameless specimen of tribal craft, dey record only di market where dem buy dem while dem wipe out di identity of di aládìrẹ́ and aláró wey make dem .
Master Practitioner-dem of Twentieth and Twenty-First Century
For di late twentieth century, some specific Yorùbá artist-dem push back against dis structural erasure wen dem set up formal studio-dem, exhibition practice-dem, and international education institution-dem:
- Chief Nike Davies-Okundaye: As fifth-generation textile artist wey dem born for Ogidi-Ijumu and wey train for Òṣogbo, Davies-Okundaye document the dying techniques of oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ during the time wey industry fall down well-well for the 1970s and 1980s . For 1983, she establish the Nike Centre for Art and Culture for Òṣogbo, dey train thousands of young Nigerian women on traditional indigo fermentation, raffia tying, and needle-stitch resist, wey come change wetin dem bin dey take as ordinary house craft into fine-art discipline wey dem dey show for exhibitions all over the world .
- Gasali Adeyemo: Person wey train for Nike Centre for Òṣogbo, Adeyemo turn master dyer and educator wey people all over the world recognize, wey dey carry go front the specific techniques of raffia-tied oníko and intricate hand-stitched alábẹ̀rẹ́, dey exhibit and show traditional vat chemistry across North America, Europe, and West Africa.
Museum Collections and Provenance Documentation
Historical examples of adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ dey inside major public ethnographic and art historical collections across the world. The way dem take catalogue these pieces dey document the change from functional Yorùbá women dress to institutionalized ethnographic artifact.
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Notable Documented Museum Holdings │
├──────────────────────┬────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┤
│ Institution │ Accession Number │ Technique / Description │
├──────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┤
│ British Museum │ Af1971,35.1 │ Adìrẹ Alábẹ̀rẹ́ wrapper │
│ (London) │ Af1971,35.2 │ 24-panel stitched wrapper │
├──────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┤
│ Metropolitan Museum │ 1994.35.172 │ Adìrẹ Alábẹ̀rẹ́ cotton │
│ of Art (New York) │ │ wrapper (20th century) │
├──────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┤
│ Harn Museum of Art │ 1995.28.17 │ Adìrẹ Oníko tie-resist │
│ (Gainesville, FL) │ │ with geometric panels │
├──────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┤
│ Institute of African │ Systematic Survey │ Reference collection for │
│ Studies (U. Ibadan) │ Collection (1960s–70s) │ Abeokuta/Ibadan taxonomies │
└──────────────────────┴────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────┘
Institutional Holdings
- The British Museum (London): Get one crucial field-collected corpus wey dem acquire under accession series
Af1971,35.1toAf1971,35.27. One major specimen naAf1971,35.1, one adìrẹ alábẹ̀rẹ́ stitch-resist cloth, together withAf1971,35.2, one 24-panel stitch-resist wrapper . Na geographer Jane Barbour collect the two cloths directly for Abẹ́òkúta for May 1971 during the systematic field survey for the Institute of African Studies . - The Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York): Get one exceptional twentieth-century adìrẹ alábẹ̀rẹ́ cotton wrapper under accession number
1994.35.172. The object enter the permanent collection for 1993 through the bequest of American collector Arthur M. Bullowa . - Samuel P. Harn Museum of Art (University of Florida, Gainesville): Get one indigo-dyed adìrẹ oníko tie-resist wrapper with geometric panels under accession number
1995.28.17, wey Rod McGalliard give as gift to the museum for 1995 . - Institute of African Studies Collection (University of Ibadan, Nigeria): Form the earliest systematic institutional collection wey dem dedicate to the nomenclature, technical taxonomy, and pattern classification of oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ textiles across the regional hubs of Abẹ́òkúta, Ìbàdàn, and Òṣogbo .
Provenance Analysis and Cataloguing Gaps
Critical check on top institutional databases dey bring out provenance omissions wey dey always happen:
- The Intermediary Bias: Museum records dey always document the Western field collector (like Jane Barbour), the expatriate donor (like Rod McGalliard), or the private collector (like Arthur M. Bullowa), while the Yorùbá women wey design and dye the cloths dey registered as "unrecorded Yorùbá artist"
- Classification Ambiguities: Museum collection records dey frequently mix oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ together, dey list objects just under the generic label "Adire cloth" Dis one dey wipe out the critical technical difference between raffia-wrapped resist and needle-stitched resist, and e dey hide whether na hand-gathering or mechanical sewing dem take produce the textile .
Scholarly Debates and Theoretical Framings
The material and economic history of adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ dey face debate across three major academic debates.
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Major Scholarly Debates in Adìrẹ │
├─────────────────────┬──────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────┤
│ Debate Focus │ Position A │ Position B │
├─────────────────────┼──────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Taxonomic │ Strict separation based │ Continuous spectrum; │
│ Classification │ on needle/machine use │ raffia stitch is a form │
│ │ (Jane Barbour) │ of oníko (Broad View) │
├─────────────────────┼──────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┤
│ 2. Technological │ Accidental origin via │ Deliberate structural │
│ Genesis │ dye vat folding │ development from weaving │
│ │ (Claire Polakoff) │ (John Picton & John Mack) │
├─────────────────────┼──────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┤
│ 3. Colonial Impact │ Destructive displacement │ Commercial scale and │
│ on Labor │ of native weavers │ creative empowerment of │
│ │ (Early Economic View) │ dyers (Judith Byfield) │
└─────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────┘
Classification: Grouping of Stitch versus Tie
Scholars no agree whether alábẹ̀rẹ́ stand on its own as separate art category or if na just one technical branch under oníko .
Jane Barbour argue say make dem separate dem clearly: oníko suppose only mean cloth wey dem tie material around something or bind pleats to prevent dye from entering, while alábẹ̀rẹ́ must stand on its own as category wey dem define by how needle (and later sewing machine) enter inside the work .
On the other hand, other textile historians talk say since early alábẹ̀rẹ́ use raffia palm fiber (ìko) as sewing thread, Yorùbá workshops understand the technique structurally and conceptually as extension of oníko . Norma H. Wolff notice say for practical work, complex wrappers dey always combine the two methods on top one cloth: dem dey use stitched lines (alábẹ̀rẹ́) do large geometric borders, while the inside area dey full of raffia wey dem tie with stone (oníko), and this one show say to strictly divide dem into two separate things no really reflect how things be .
Technological Genesis: Accidental Fold versus Intentional Innovation
Long-time debate dey about how mechanical resist techniques take start for West Africa.
Claire Polakoff bring out idea of "accidental discovery," where she suggest say resist pattern first start when cloth mistakenly twist, gather together, or crush inside indigo dye pit, wey come make the dyers start to deliberately copy the light lines wey come out by tying raffia rope .
John Picton and John Mack reject this accidental idea, say e too simplify the matter . Dem argue say adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ develop intentionally from deep local understanding of loom mechanics, yarn tension, and the chemistry of plant dye . For their analysis, the deliberate way dem take hold fibers so that dye liquid no go enter some parts of the cloth na intellectual and technological continuation of Yorùbá cloth-making traditions, no be just sudden reaction to mistake wey happen for workshop .
Colonial Economy: Destruction of Kíjìpá versus Empowerment of Dyers
How people assess the socioeconomic effect of British colonial policy on adìrẹ craft don bring serious reinterpretation.
Early colonial history books see the way mass-produced Manchester cotton cloth and imported synthetic dye rush enter as heavy economic blow wey wipe out local thread-spinning and broadloom weaving (kíjìpá) .
Judith Byfield challenge this complete story of decline by giving detailed social history of Abẹ́òkúta dyers' guilds . Byfield show say even though British factory cloth wey dem import spoil market for local spinners of kíjìpá, women aládìrẹ́ and aláró quickly use the smooth, cheap calico cloth take bring down their production cost well well, create finer stitched patterns (alábẹ̀rẹ́), and expand their business across different regions for West Africa . The colonial market no just destroy Yorùbá textile control like that; instead, women dyers use the imported goods take expand textile empire wey women control by demself .
Dating, Preservation, and Restitution Questions
Material Degradation and the Absence of Pre-Twentieth-Century Specimens
To get exact dates for early adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ hard well well because the materials no dey last . Cotton and raffia na natural plant fibers wey dey quickly spoil for the high humidity, heavy heat, and acidic soil of southern Nigeria . On top of that, dem make adìrẹ mainly as everyday cloth, wrapper sets, and market trade goods, wey people wear, wash, and rub again and again until dem tear finish .
Because of this, physical museum samples of oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́ from before late nineteenth century almost no dey at all . Scholars dey rely on wetin travelers write down, trade records, and oral history to trace the pre-colonial history, while museum artifacts wey get sure date na almost purely things from the twentieth century .
The Restitution Archive: Market Trade versus Looted Artifacts
The discussion about returning African material heritage from Western institutions dey follow different parameters when e reach adìrẹ oníko and alábẹ̀rẹ́.
Unlike royal brass plaque-dem, sacred ivory carving-dem, and ceremonial regalia wey dem seize during military attack-dem (like wen British scatter Benin City for 1897), dem no loot historical adìrẹ cloth-dem during war . The documented record of where major museum collection-dem from come (like the Barbour acquisition-dem for British Museum or the Bullowa bequest for Metropolitan Museum) show say these textile-dem enter Western public institution-dem through direct buying from Nigerian market-dem, ethnographic research trip-dem, or donation from private estate-dem .
As a result, no record dey of government-to-government restitution claim wey dey demand make dem legally return adìrẹ oníko or alábẹ̀rẹ́ wrapper-dem. Instead, contemporary post-colonial scholarship dey focus on:
- Provenance Rectification: To correct museum catalogue database-dem so dat dem go stop to erase female dyer-dem from history, and to record the exact compound and market where the cloth-dem from come well-well .
- Digital and Epistemic Access: To make sure say high-resolution technical document-dem, pattern taxonomy-dem, and historical field note-dem dey fully accessible to Nigerian researcher-dem and practicing textile artist-dem for Abẹ́òkúta, Ìbàdàn, and Òṣogbo .
- Ethical Display: To present adìrẹ no be like timeless ethnographic curiosity, but as sophisticated and historically dynamic technology wey belong to named and organized Yorùbá women guild intellectual-dem .