Destiny Is Negotiable
An analysis of human destiny in Yoruba metaphysics, examining the tripartite taxonomy of destiny, the role of human striving and moral character, and how self-inflicted ruin complicates fatalism.
In Yorùbá metaphysics, destiny is neither an ironclad fatalism nor an unconstrained landscape of radical autonomy. It is conceived through the doctrine of Orí (the physical and spiritual inner head), representing the potential, personality, and life course that a person selects or receives in the realm of Ọ̀run (the spiritual realm) before birth . Although classical theological formulations suggest that an individual's allotment is sealed before entry into Ayé (the physical world), lived Yorùbá thought and formal philosophical discourse treat destiny as a dynamic matrix conditioned by ẹsẹ̀ (human striving), ìwà (moral character), ritual adjustments (ẹbọ), and self-inflicted sabotage (àfọwọ́fà) . Destiny is thus an ontological blueprint that requires human labor and ethical alignment to reach actualization, leaving room for both negotiation and tragic failure .
The Taxonomy of Destiny
Yorùbá thought breaks down the broad English term "destiny" into distinct metaphysical categories, each describing the specific mode by which an allotment is acquired in the presence of Ọlọ́dùmarè (the Supreme Being) . Rather than treating personal fate as a single undifferentiated decree, the tradition recognizes three classical modalities .
Àkúnlẹ̀yàn. Morphologically derived from à-kún-lẹ̀-yàn (that which is chosen while kneeling), this mode denotes an active, pre-natal selection made by the individual spirit (ẹ̀mí) . In this modality, the prospective human agent approaches the divine workshop and chooses a particular life package, specifying preferences regarding longevity, prosperity, vocations, and familial lineage .
Àkúnlẹ̀gbà. Morphologically derived from à-kún-lẹ̀-gbà (that which is received while kneeling), this mode signifies an allotment conferred directly upon the kneeling spirit by divine authority or celestial intermediaries . Unlike àkúnlẹ̀yàn, where agency is exercised through deliberate selection, àkúnlẹ̀gbà represents destiny handed down as an assigned dispensation, defining conditions that the soul accepts rather than originates .
Àyànmọ́. Morphologically derived from à-yàn-mọ́ (that which is affixed, bound, or stamped upon one), this term captures the permanently sealed dimension of destiny . Àyànmọ́ is the finality with which the chosen or received package is fixed to the individual's spiritual core. In everyday speech, àyànmọ́ has become the umbrella term for destiny itself, often conveying the sense of an inescapable structural baseline .
These three categories are grounded in the concept of Orí, specifically Orí inú (the inner or spiritual head) . Orí is an individual's personal spiritual double, personal divinity, and the locus of all earthly possibilities . Every prospective person kneels before entering the world to receive or choose their Orí, which is then ratified and sealed by Ọlọ́dùmarè before the passage from Ọ̀run to Ayé begins .
The Mythological Paradigm: Àjàlá's Workshop
The foundational narrative of destiny selection is preserved within the Ifá literary corpus, particularly within the Odu Ògúndá Méjì and related verses documented by Wande Abimbola . According to this narrative, before any soul descends into the world, it must visit the workshop of Àjàlá, the celestial potter who molds Orí from physical and spiritual clay .
Àjàlá is depicted not as an omniscient artisan, but as an erratic, indebted, and sometimes careless craftsman . Some of the heads he molds are thoroughly baked, structurally sound, and aesthetically flawless, while others are underbaked, misshapen, brittle, or cracked . When a prospective soul arrives at Àjàlá's storehouse, the heads are displayed without labels indicating their internal durability or inherent fortune . The soul selects an Orí based purely on external appearance, lacking the cognitive or prophetic capacity to discern whether the vessel is defective or sound .
Once a selection is made, the individual carries the chosen Orí to the barrier between heaven and earth, where Ọlọ́dùmarè ratifies the choice, sealing its parameters . If a person unknowingly chooses an orí burúkú (a bad or defective head), they arrive on earth encumbered with structural difficulties, whereas one who chooses an orí rere (a good head) enters the world endowed with intrinsic prospects for prosperity, children, and health .
This narrative creates an immediate philosophical paradox that Yorùbá scholars continue to debate:
- The choice of head is technically voluntary, because the soul picks it without overt physical coercion .
- The choice is epistemologically blind, because the soul has no foreknowledge of the head's structural integrity or spiritual contents .
Consequently, scholars like Olusegun Oladipo and Oladele Balogun point out that treating the selection in Àjàlá's workshop as a fully autonomous, rational moral choice stretches the definition of agency, given that true autonomy presupposes an informed awareness of alternatives .
Determinism Versus Compatibilism: The Scholarly Divide
The relationship between Orí, divine decree, and human agency has produced a major theoretical division among philosophers of African thought, who debate whether the Yorùbá metaphysical system is a closed fatalism (hard determinism) or an open framework of interactive potentials (soft determinism or compatibilism) .
Metaphysical Spectrum of Yoruba Destiny:
[Hard Determinism / Fatalism] <===================> [Soft Determinism / Compatibilism]
- Immutability of Ayànmọ́ - Negotiability through Ẹbọ (Sacrifice)
- Àjàlá's pre-natal sealing - Requirement of Ẹsẹ̀ (Physical Striving)
- Inability of Òrìṣà to override - Requirement of Ìwà (Moral Character)
- Ex-post-facto fatalist axioms - Derailment via Àfọwọ́fà (Self-Ruin)
(W. Abimbola, Idowu, Oduwole) (Gbadegesin, Balogun, Oluwole, Makinde)
The Hard-Determinist and Quasi-Fatalist Perspective
The hard-determinist reading asserts that once an Orí is chosen, conferred, and sealed, the trajectory of a person's life on earth is unalterable . Proponents of this view rely on explicit declarations within Ifá poetry that assert the absolute finality of the pre-natal pact .
Wande Abimbola's early structural analysis of the Ifá corpus emphasizes that Orí functions as a personal supreme divinity whose decrees cannot be countermanded by any external spiritual force . Not even the powerful òrìṣà (divinities) possess the authority or metaphysical leverage to alter an individual's chosen destiny without the explicit consent of that individual's Orí . In Abimbola's exposition, Ifá verses routinely present destiny as an ontological seal: what has been chosen in Ọ̀run cannot be renegotiated at will in Ayé .
E. Bọlaji Idowu presents a theological variant of this determinism, arguing that àyànmọ́ is doubly sealed by the omnipotent decree of Ọlọ́dùmarè . Idowu draws attention to proverbial maxims such as Àyànmọ́ ò gbóògùn (destiny cannot be cured by medicine), maintaining that at the level of systematic theology, the Yorùbá view of fate approaches unconditional predestination . This position is echoed by Ebun Oduwole, who contends that the metaphysical logic of pre-natal conferment precludes genuine ontological revision once physical birth takes place .
The Soft-Determinist and Compatibilist Perspective
Conversely, contemporary philosophers including Segun Gbadegesin, Oladele Anthony Balogun, Sophie B. Oluwole, and Moses Akin Makinde argue that the hard-determinist reading distorts Yorùbá thought by isolating pre-natal selection from the day-to-day demands of lived reality . They advance a soft-determinist or compatibilist interpretation, arguing that Orí establishes the baseline boundaries, capacities, and general trajectory of a human life, but does not micromanage individual actions or guarantee automatic outcomes .
Segun Gbadegesin demonstrates that in traditional life, an inherently good destiny (orí rere) is merely a bundle of unactualized possibilities . It requires continuous human cultivation, rigorous application, and moral discipline to be realized . If destiny were completely fixed and self-executing, the entire enterprise of moral instruction, legal sanction, medical treatment, and ritual intervention would be logically redundant .
Sophie B. Oluwole approaches the question from moral philosophy, observing that the Yorùbá social and judicial order consistently applies moral praise, blameworthiness, social sanctions, and legal penalties to wrongdoers . If an individual's criminal or anti-social actions were understood as the mechanical execution of an unalterable pre-natal decree, attributing moral responsibility would be unjust . The existence of ethical accountability confirms that individuals are recognized as possessing genuine free agency and volitional capacity .
Oladele Balogun builds on this by identifying soft determinism as the only model that harmonizes the contradictory axioms found in Yorùbá oral literature . Balogun argues that while Orí dictates an individual's metaphysical baseline and innate temperament, the actual fruition of that destiny is conditioned by three dynamic variables: human striving (ẹsẹ̀), moral conduct (ìwà), and the maintenance of cosmic balance through sacrifice (ẹbọ) and consultation with diviners (babaláwo) .
The Principle of Ẹsẹ̀: Striving and Locomotion
To explain how human agency interacts with destiny, Yorùbá metaphysics introduces the concept of Ẹsẹ̀ . While Orí is the seat of potential and fate, ẹsẹ̀ (literally "leg" or "foot") symbolizes physical locomotion, struggle, enterprise, and sustained labor .
In the cosmology of the human person, Orí cannot travel to its destination without the physical support and dynamic movement provided by ẹsẹ̀ . Kola Abimbola points out that in Yorùbá philosophical accounts, ẹsẹ̀ represents the essential principle of personal striving . An individual may possess an Orí endowed with immense prosperity, high office, or scholarly mastery, but if that person refuses to engage ẹsẹ̀ through hard work, persistence, and physical effort, the latent potential within the Orí remains dormant and unmanifested .
The relationship between Orí and ẹsẹ̀ is illustrated in verses of the Ifá corpus where Ẹsẹ̀ is personified as a spiritual entity claiming parity with the other limbs and divinities . In these narratives, when the various parts of the person assemble to distribute fortunes and roles, Ẹsẹ̀ points out that without its willingness to walk, carry, and labor, no divine allotment can be brought into physical reality . Human striving is therefore not an afterthought, but an indispensable metaphysical partner in the fulfillment of destiny .
Character (Ìwà) as the Preserver of Destiny
If ẹsẹ̀ provides the physical engine for actualizing destiny, ìwà (character, moral conduct, or being) serves as its protective container . In Yorùbá ethics, good character is famously designated as ìwà pẹ̀lẹ́ (gentle, balanced character) or ìwà rere (good character) .
Destiny and character are structurally interdependent. A good Orí without ìwà is regarded as inherently unstable . Traditional thought maintains that an individual blessed with a glorious pre-natal allocation will inevitably dismantle their own prospects if they exhibit ìwà búburú (wicked character), arrogance (ìgbéraga), impatience (àìnísùúrù), or deceit .
-
Original text: Ìwà nìkan lólórí burúkú ń wá; Bí a lówó lọ́wọ́, bí a kò nīwà, Owó olówó ni; Ìwà lẹ̀ṣọ́ ènìyàn.
-
Literal gloss: Character only is-what-person-with-bad-head is looking-for; If we have-money in-hand, if we not have-character, Money of-another-person it-is; Character is-adornment of-human-being.
-
Idiomatic translation: Character is the one thing a person with an unfortunate head lacks; Though we possess great wealth, if we lack character, That wealth belongs to another; Character is the true adornment of humanity. (Attributed to traditional Ifá oral corpus; translated by Wande Abimbola ).
Notes on the translation: In the first line, olórí burúkú is literally "the owner of a bad head", but contextually denotes someone whose fortunes are ruined or who lacks spiritual alignment. The third line, owó olówó ni, emphasizes that material riches acquired without character are transitory, liable to pass into the hands of others. The word ẹ̀ṣọ́ translates as cosmetic adornment or armor, signifying that character both beautifies human life and shields destiny from external destruction.
The ethical requirement of ìwà demonstrates that the realization of destiny is conditional . The pre-natal selection is not a magic charm that operates independently of the agent's behavioral choices. Moral failure ruptures the individual's harmony with their spiritual self, resulting in the dissipation of fortunes that were otherwise preordained .
Self-Causation and Ruined Fortune: Àfọwọ́fà
The strongest evidence against fatalism in Yorùbá thought is the operational concept of àfọwọ́fà .
Morphology and Meaning
Àfọwọ́fà is a compound noun constructed from the components:
- à- (nominalizing prefix, "that which")
- fí ọwọ́ (with the hand)
- fà (to draw, pull, drag, or bring upon oneself)
Literally, àfọwọ́fà translates to "that which is pulled toward oneself by one's own hand" . In philosophical discourse, it denotes self-causation, self-inflicted calamity, or a ruined life path resulting from personal negligence, destructive habits, or deliberate wrongdoing .
Metaphysical Causation of Human Misfortune:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Sources of Misfortune │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────────────────┴───────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
┌───────────────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────────────┐
│ Transcendental / Orí │ │ Empirical / Self-Inflicted │
├───────────────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────────────┤
│ - Defective head (Orí burúkú) │ │ - Àfọwọ́fà (Hand-pulled ruin) │
│ - Unseen spiritual attacks │ │ - Ìwà búburú (Vicious conduct)│
│ - Inexplicable cosmic failure │ │ - Ọ̀lẹ (Indolence/No Ẹsẹ̀) │
└───────────────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────────────┘
The Analytical Function of Àfọwọ́fà
Yorùbá epistemological practice strictly distinguishes between transcendental misfortunes attributable to Orí and empirical misfortunes brought about through àfọwọ́fà .
When a person suffers an unprovoked illness, an unpredictable natural disaster, or a sudden loss that defies rational explanation despite righteous conduct and vigorous effort, the calamity is classified as belonging to the realm of Orí or cosmic adversity . However, when an individual gambles away family inheritance, contracts an illness through reckless behavior, or faces imprisonment for theft, the community rejects any appeal to destiny . The misfortune is classified as àfọwọ́fà .
The existence of àfọwọ́fà serves three critical social and philosophical purposes:
- Rejection of Fatalistic Excuses. It prevents individuals from using àyànmọ́ as an excuse for personal failures, moral decay, or indolence .
- Preservation of Moral Order. It provides the theoretical justification for communal judgment, moral censure, and legal punishment .
- Affirmation of Human Autonomy. It establishes that human beings possess genuine agency capable of altering, disrupting, or entirely destroying their pre-natal potential .
Proverbial Analysis of Alterability
The dialectic between unalterable destiny and self-caused ruin is encapsulated in classical Yorùbá proverbs.
-
Original text: Àyànmọ́ ò gbóògùn; Bí a gúnkè, bí a wọ̀dò, Àyànmọ́ kò ní yẹ̀.
-
Literal gloss: Destiny not hear-medicine (destiny is not cured by medicinal preparation); If we climb-mountain, if we enter-river, Destiny not will deviate.
-
Idiomatic translation: Destiny cannot be cured by medicinal concoctions; Whether we scale the highest mountain or plunge into the river, Appointed destiny will not swerve from its course. (Recorded by E. Bọlaji Idowu ; translation idiomatic).
What it means: At its baseline, this proverb asserts that the essential structural characteristics of an individual's life cannot be bypassed through superficial magical charms or material evasion .
What it is used for: The proverb is used primarily for consolation in the face of inexplicable tragedy or to caution individuals against exhausting their resources on fraudulent healers promising impossible alterations of reality .
Scenarios: An illustrative scenario occurs when a hardworking farmer faces the tragic loss of all offspring to an endemic plague despite consulting every physician in the region. Elders invoke the proverb to console the bereaved, framing the loss not as personal moral failure, but as a mysterious spiritual constraint beyond human medicine .
Tonality and nuances: The tone pattern on ò gbóògùn (low, mid, high, low) carries the categorical negation ò (does not). Stripping the tone marks obscures the negative marker, converting a metaphysical prohibition into an incomprehensible fragment.
This fatalist formulation is counterbalanced by an opposing proverb addressing àfọwọ́fà:
-
Original text: Ọwọ́ ẹni ní a fi ń tún orí ara ẹni ṣe.
-
Literal gloss: Hand of-person is we with use repair head body of-person do.
-
Idiomatic translation: It is with one's own hands that a person repairs their own destiny. (Documented by Oladele Anthony Balogun ; translation idiomatic).
What it means: Human labor, ethical action, and conscious striving can actively mend, optimize, and rehabilitate one's life conditions .
What it is used for: It is deployed as a rebuke against indolence, an exhortation to personal enterprise, and an encouragement to people struggling under adverse circumstances .
Scenarios: An illustrative instance involves a young apprentice who blames an ancestral curse for their lack of progress. A master craftsperson recites this proverb to remind the apprentice that daily discipline and focused application are the sole mechanisms through which human fortunes are rebuilt .
Ritual Rectification and Divinatory Negotiation
Beyond individual striving and ethical conduct, Yorùbá cosmology provides an institutional mechanism for negotiating destiny: the system of Ifá divination overseen by the Babaláwo (father of secrets / diviner) and directed toward the divinity Ọ̀rúnmìlà .
The Role of Ọ̀rúnmìlà and the Babaláwo
Ọ̀rúnmìlà is revered as Ẹlẹ́rìí Ìpín (the witness of destiny or allotment) . According to tradition, Ọ̀rúnmìlà was present when each soul knelt before Ọlọ́dùmarè to choose or receive its Orí . Consequently, while the incarnate human being forgets their pre-natal pact upon crossing into Ayé, Ọ̀rúnmìlà retains the full record of every person's potential, vulnerabilities, and prescribed requirements .
When an individual experiences persistent disruption, they consult a Babaláwo . Through the manipulation of the ikin (sacred palm nuts) or the ọ̀pẹ̀lẹ̀ (divining chain), the Babaláwo decodes the relevant Odù Ifá, identifying whether the client's current struggles stem from a defective Orí, an unfulfilled pre-natal vow, ethical lapses, malevolent spiritual forces, or àfọwọ́fà .
Divinatory Remediation Process:
[Individual in Crisis]
│
▼
[Consultation with Babaláwo] <─── Diviner accesses memory of Ọ̀rúnmìlà (Ẹlẹ́rìí Ìpín)
│
▼
[Diagnosis of the Odù Ifá] ────── Identifies root cause: Orí, Ẹlẹ́yẹ, Ìwà, or Àfọwọ́fà
│
▼
[Prescription of Ẹbọ (Sacrifice)]
│
├───> [Spiritual Reconciliation: Appeasement of cosmic forces]
└───> [Practical Guidance: Reformation of Ìwà and application of Ẹsẹ̀]
The Function of Ẹbọ (Sacrifice)
Divination typically prescribes ẹbọ (sacrifice), which performs two functions in the negotiation of destiny :
- Neutralizing Malevolent Interference. Yorùbá thought recognizes external spiritual adversaries known collectively as ọmọ aráyé (children of the world) or ẹlẹ́yẹ (witches / owners of birds), alongside disruptive spiritual agents (ajogun) such as death (ikú), disease (àrùn), and loss (òfò) . These forces possess the malevolent capacity to spoil (bàjẹ́) an otherwise excellent destiny . Ẹbọ placates or repels these forces, clearing obstacles from the individual's path .
- Reconciling the Individual with their Orí. In cases where a person's behavior has alienated their own Orí, ẹbọ functions as a ritual act of atonement and realignments, restoring harmony between the physical person and their spiritual double .
Scholars disagree over the precise metaphysical mechanics of ẹbọ . Determinists like Abimbola and Idowu maintain that sacrifice cannot alter the fundamental structural blueprint of àyànmọ́, but merely provides the spiritual cushion needed to navigate the challenges inherent in a difficult destiny . Compatibilists like Balogun argue that ẹbọ constitutes a genuine ontological negotiation, unlocking hidden avenues of relief and transforming negative baselines into viable human experiences .
The Epistemological Function: Oladipo's Ex-Post-Facto Thesis
A major contribution to the philosophy of Yorùbá destiny is Olusegun Oladipo's critique of predestination . Oladipo addresses the paradox of why the Yorùbá simultaneously maintain that destiny is fixed (àyànmọ́ ò gbóògùn) and that it can be altered or ruined through human action (ọwọ́ ẹni ní a fi ń tún orí ṣe) .
Oladipo argues that àyànmọ́ is not a formal metaphysical doctrine designed to satisfy abstract academic logic . Instead, it functions as an ex-post-facto explanatory device, an epistemological and psychological mechanism used by the community to cope with the limits of human foresight and control .
Oladipo's Ex-Post-Facto Model of Destiny Attribution:
Action / Event Occurs
│
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
[Event is Explainable & Controllable] [Event Defies Rational Effort]
│ │
▼ ▼
Attributed to Empirical Agency: Attributed to Transcendental Fate:
- Ẹsẹ̀ (Physical hard work) - Orí / Àyànmọ́ (Sealed Destiny)
- Ìwà (Moral character) - Consolation for inexplicable loss
- Àfọwọ́fà (Self-inflicted ruin) - Preservation of psychological sanity
Under Oladipo's model:
- When an individual acts in the present or plans for the future, the operating framework is thoroughgoing agency: they are expected to exercise effort (ẹsẹ̀), maintain virtue (ìwà), and perform necessary rituals (ẹbọ) .
- When an unexpected, devastating failure occurs despite exhaustive labor and upright character, the community looks backward and invokes àyànmọ́ .
By framing an inexplicable tragedy as the fulfillment of a pre-natal decree, the individual and the community are protected from despair and psychological disintegration . The doctrine of destiny explains why bad things happen to good people without indicting the justice of the supreme being or declaring the cosmos to be fundamentally chaotic .
Gaps, Silences, and Unresolved Tensions
The traditional corpus and contemporary scholarship leave several metaphysical problems open.
The Mechanics of Pre-Natal Cognition
The Ifá corpus is silent on how an unborn spirit (ẹ̀mí) exercises discernment in Àjàlá's workshop before possessing an earthly brain, physical senses, or life experience . If the spirit lacks knowledge of what constitutes a good or bad life, the act of "choosing" an Orí is logically arbitrary . Philosophers remain divided on whether this narrative should be interpreted as an allegorical myth representing the mystery of human inequality or as an account of metaphysical selection .
The Immutability Boundary
The exact line separating alterable conditions from unalterable constraints remains philosophically contested . The tradition offers no definitive formula to determine beforehand whether an ongoing hardship is an immutable aspect of àyànmọ́ that must be endured, or a temporary blockage caused by àfọwọ́fà or ọmọ aráyé that can be resolved through ẹbọ and hard work . This ambiguity ensures that diviners and individuals continually treat all misfortunes as negotiable until all practical, ethical, and ritual avenues have been exhausted .
History and evolution
The earliest documented accounts of Yorùbá destiny discourse appear in oral liturgical recitations codified within the Ifá corpus across classical settlements such as Ilé-Ifẹ̀ and early Ọ̀yọ́ . During the height of the Ọ̀yọ́ Empire in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the theology of Orí and destiny negotiation was deeply intertwined with imperial political structure, where royal lineages utilized Ifá diviners to ratify state decisions and validate the preordained authority of the Aláàfin .
The collapse of Ọ̀yọ́ and the nineteenth-century Yorùbá civil wars caused profound socio-political upheaval, prompting widespread personal recourse to babaláwo as displaced populations sought to understand catastrophic disruptions to their pre-natal fortunes . During this era, Christian missionary contact, spearheaded by figures such as Samuel Ajayi Crowther in the mid-nineteenth century, introduced rigid Western theological concepts of predestination and providence, often mischaracterizing àyànmọ́ as unyielding pagan fatalism .
Under British colonial rule in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, codifications of customary law and colonial ethnographies further rigidified dynamic metaphysical ideas into fixed deterministic dogmas . Samuel Johnson's 1921 historical treatise preserved critical oral records of these cosmological practices while reflecting the interpretive tensions between indigenous metaphysics and Victorian Christian monotheism . Following Nigerian independence in 1960, academic philosophers such as Makinde, Gbadegesin, and Oladipo initiated a systematic re-evaluation of destiny, disentangling indigenous compatibilism from missionary deterministic readings .
Today, destiny negotiation remains active in both West Africa and the transatlantic diaspora, including Lucumí, Candomblé, and modern Ìṣẹ̀ṣe lineages . Practitioners continue to perform bọ́rí (propitiation of the inner head) and ẹbọ to harmonize personal agency with cosmic potential, demonstrating the resilience of soft-determinist metaphysics in contemporary global contexts .
Àwọn orísun
- [1]Wande Abimbola, Ifá: An Exposition of Ifá Literary Corpus (Ibadan: Oxford University Press Nigeria, 1976), pp. 113–149.
- [2]Kola Abimbola, Yorùbá Culture: A Philosophical Account (Birmingham: Iroko Academics Publishers, 2006), pp. 67–92.
- [3]Segun Gbadegesin, African Philosophy: Traditional Yoruba Philosophy and Contemporary African Realities (New York: Peter Lang, 1991), pp. 27–59.
- [4]J. Omosade Awolalu and P. Adelumo Dopamu, West African Traditional Religion (Ibadan: Onibonoje Press, 1979; revised edition Ibadan: Macmillan Nigeria, 2005), pp. 165–182.
- [5]Oladele Anthony Balogun, "The Concepts of Ori and Human Destiny in Traditional Yoruba Thought: A Soft-Deterministic Interpretation," Nordic Journal of African Studies, Vol. 16, No. 1 (2007), pp. 116–130.
- [6]E. Bọlaji Idowu, Olódùmarè: God in Yoruba Belief (London: Longmans, 1962), pp. 169–188.
- [7]Olusegun Oladipo, "Predestination in Yoruba Thought: A Philosophico-Religious Interpretation," Orita: Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies, Vol. 24, No. 2 (1992), pp. 36–49.
- [8]Moses Akin Makinde, "A Philosophical Analysis of the Yoruba Concept of Ori and Human Destiny," International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1 (1985), pp. 53–69; cited in Balogun, Nordic Journal of African Studies (2007).
- [9]Sophie B. Oluwole, "Self-Determination and Moral Responsibility in Yoruba Philosophy," in Yoruba Philosophy (Lagos: Ark Publishers, 1984/1992), pp. 88–104.
- [10]Samuel Johnson, The History of the Yorubas: From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the British Protectorate (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1921). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Yoruba_people